गुजरात का विकास पूँजीवादी मॉडल का SIDE EFFECT

VISION FOR ALL

• 270 Posts
• 28 Comments

अर्थशास्त्री स्वामीनाथन अय्यर ने स्वामीनॉमिक्स(TIMES OF INDIA) मेँ मोदी मॉडल के बारे मेँ कुछ भी खास नहीँ लिखा है,जो मुझे प्रभावित कर सके।मोदी का मॉडल एक WELL ORGANIZED CRONY CAPITALIST MODEL है।गुजरात का विकास इसी पूँजीवादी मॉडल का SIDE EFFECT है।जब हम उद्योगपति को सस्ते दर पर जमीन देँगे,टैक्स में छूट देँगे और प्रोजेक्ट को तुरंत हरी झंडी दे देँगे,फिर वह औद्योगिक विकास या आधारिक सुविधाओँ के विकास का कार्य क्योँ नहीँ करेगा,जिसकी जिम्मेदारी उसे दी गई है।इस मॉडल मेँ कहीँ पर भी SOCIAL WELFARE नहीँ है।ये सिर्फ अमेरिका और अन्य पश्चिमी पूँजीवादी देश का नकल भर है।इस मॉडल ने कई किसानोँ और आदिवासियोँ का जमीन छीन लिया,लघु उद्योगोँ को बर्बाद कर दिया।जो किसान,आदिवासी,लघु उद्यमी अपने संपति का मालिक थे,आज पूँजीपतियोँ का मजदूर हो गए।पूँजीपतियोँ के बगैर अपने क्षमता के बल पर लघु उद्योगोँ,वंचित किसानोँ और आदिवासियोँ का विकास करने पर ही ये माना जा सकता है कि मोदी मॉडल Sustainable and adoptable है।हिम्मत है तो पूँजीपतियोँ के बगैर विकास करके दिखाए।मोदी समर्थक को मेरी खुली चुनौती इस मुद्दे पर विमर्श करने की।

…………….
The BJP Prime Ministerial Candidate filed his nomination papers along with Affidavit on 10/4/2014 from the Vadodara Parliamentary Constituency wherein he has revealed one Jashodaben his wife in spouse column in the prescribed form but didn’t fill the information regarding assets and liabilities of his wife.

Earlier,he had left the spouse column blank in the Assembly elections of 2002,2007 and 2012.

We have either one view out of two views to observe this matter-

(i) Earlier he had furnished false information before the Returning Officer being legally found to furnish it which leads to an offence under section 177 of the IPC. Also, he had submitted false statement on affidavit before the returning officer which leads to an offence under section 181 of the IPC. Or,

(ii) Earlier he had intentionally omitted to furnish correct information which leads to an offence under section 176 of the IPC.

Therefore, Mr.Narendra Modi is guilty either of one offence out of two offences expressed above.

Narendra Modi has not submitted information regarding assets and liabilities of his wife. Although ,there is no clear provision in the Representation of the People Act,1951 to declare assets and liabilities of spouse before being elected as section 33A of the said Act only makes it mandatory to declare the criminal records of a contesting candidate and if one becomes fail to comply with this provision ,his nomination be rejected by the returning officer in exercise of the power conferred under section 36(2) of the Representation of the People Act,1951.Though, section 75A of the Representation Of the People Act,1951 makes it mandatory to declare the assets and liabilities even of spouse after being elected. After being elected if Narendra Modi fails to comply with the provision of section 75A of the said Act, he must be disqualified from being a member of the house of people (Lok Sabha) .