Menu
blogid : 8093 postid : 429

NEW EVIDENCES TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE

VISION FOR ALL
VISION FOR ALL
  • 270 Posts
  • 28 Comments

NEW EVIDENCES TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE

Yesterday,i have received Xerox Copy of complaint filed against me before the SDO by the said mother under force of principal and managing with SDO..

1.It is stated that complaint had already been filed on 21.9.2011 (Application No.1144/2011) but no action was taken.So, again complaint is filed on 13.9.2012 (Application No.1084/2012)..Actually,complaint of 21.9.2011 was not filed in the said date but filed after 5 months in back date, so no action was taken on complaint of dt.21.9.2011 because it was forged.So it was again filed on 13.9.2012 to show that no action was taken earlier ,so complaint is filed again.But the question is why no action was taken earlier.It happened under fixing with SDO and the complaint was filed in back date ,so no action was taken earlier and filed again to show that complaint had been filed earlier on 21.9.2011 in real to hide the forgery committed in the name of earlier complaint.

Why complaint was filed again after 1 year? She should have been filed again after 2-3 months of filing first complaint in case of no action taken.In fact,there is no need to file complaint again and she could enforce the SDO to take action by going to his office or through RTI or giving application to take action in regard to her complaint.But complaint is filed again instead of doing such because it was to show that complaint was filed in real earlier on 21.9.2011 and no action was taken, so complaint is filed again.

2.Her statements in complaint of dt 21.9.2011 filed to SDO contradict her statements in complaint of dt.13.9.2012.It is stated in complaint of dt 21.9.2011 that she firstly understood me to not torture her son after informing by her son and i continued torturing,then she informed to housemaster and he understood me but i kept torturing then lastly after summer vacation she complained to the principal and enquiry was conducted and unnatural offence committed by me against her son for 1-2 times was cleared in enquiry.In contrast to this,it is written in complaint of dt.13.9.2012 that when she was informed of the torturing by her son,she directly complained to the principal and i was scolded but i continued torturing and in the meanwhile her son came to home in summer vacation and informed her about unnatural offence and after vacation,she complained to principal about unnatural offence committed 2 times by me.Now all facts changed and 1-2 times changed into 2 times.How it happened?In her complaint filed before Principal on 22.8.2011,she has written that her son informed her that i used to force her to sleep by coming at 10-11 P:M and he was forcibly staying with me.Means,her son didn’t inform her about unnatural offence which she has written on complaint of dt.13.9.2012 and unnatural offence was not exposed on enquiry as she has written in complaint of dt.21.9.2011 because it is not written in complaint of 22.8.2011 but enquiry had been conducted on 6.7.2011 as it is written that house of the boy was changed after enquiry and it was changed on 6.7.2011.In contrast to all statements,the boy has stated in his statement that he has not informed to his mother.He has directly filed complaint to principal on 22.9.2011.Means,he has filed complaint after all complaining of her mother done in 2011 expect of 13.9.2012.Means,his mother complained without her son’s statement.He has only written that while sleeping he felt sometimes that i used to come to his bed at delay night,not at 10-11 P:M to sleep and sometimes he also slept on my bed and after awaking at morning he was known that he has slept on my bed.His statement neither prove unnatural offence,nor prove forcibly sleeping.

3.It is written that i was sent home for mental treatment by principal after her complaining after of summer vacation.But principal has himself written that i was not sent home,but i myself went to home as per my desire for special treatment,not mental.Again,it is written that after coming from treatment,i remained right for some days but again i started to torture her son.Her son complained her and she complained to principal and principal informed my father to take my TC and he is going to expell me and listening this i ran away on 24.8.2011.In contrast to this,principal himself has written in report that after special treatment,i only remained in school for a night on 23.8.2011 and i was allowed to live in school after medical report and i ran away on 24.8.2011.So, as per report of principal,i was not torturing her son because i only remained in school for a night,not for some days and my father was not informed to take TC as principal is saying that i was allowed to live.However,saying about expulsion by the said mother reflects that i was expelled as principal is saying that he has not expelled me.

4. In her complaint of dt.13.9.2012,it is stated that i use to threat her by myself,my father and mother and by my party through a No.09689227049.In her complaint of dt.21.9.2011,one more Number starting with 26 is mentioned which is forge as customer care says and only written that my party use to threat her,not also myself,my father and mother.The No.09689227049 belongs to Shirdi,Maharashtra and belongs to her relative.She has given the name of her relative to trap me.

5.In her complaint of dt.21.9.2011,it is written that i was threatening her by calling her and sending message.In her complaint of dt.13.9.2012,it is written that still i am threatening her by calling her and sending message.Principal has written that i was sending message to her son,not sending her and in contrast to all, her son has written nothing about it-whether sent to him or his mother.

6.It is written in complaint of dt.21.9.2011 that i was threatening her that if i will be expelled ,i will not ignore her .Now in her complaint of dt 13.9.2012,it is written that i am threatening her that i have been expelled because of her ,so i will not ignore her and her family and saying to finish the life of all and saying same openly.Now she has included her family also as the victim of event and included that i am saying to finish all and saying openly.

7.In her statement of dt.21.9.2011,it is written that my mother and father said her after calling on the date of my absconding through the Mobile No.9234014790 and 9234283676 that she and her son will be not ignored,if i am not found.But my father was at Samastipur and both No were at home that day.Only my mother were at home and she herself talked to my mother through telephone…In contrast to this,she has said in her statement of dt.13.9.2012 that i myself,my father and mother are threatening her,not have threatened only on the date of absconding and included me also but removed the name of her son as the victim of the event, by the above both Numbers.

8.It is written that i sent her SMS during absconding.But i had no mobile and if there would be mobile along with me,i would be caught where i have ran away.

9.It is written that i have sent her Contempt Notice twice by threatening her that i will not ignore her because she is the reason of my expulsion.But in my contempt Notice,i have raised question against her motive that she has lodged complaint against me after 6 months having no action taken which is only humiliation of my dignity.

10.Focusing the expulsion three times in her complaint of dt.13.9.2012 and two times in her complaint of dt.21.9.2011 by the said mother proves that i was expelled in real.In this view of matter,no application should be submitted to principal as principal is saying that i was not expelled and issued TC on father request.In this condition,if i was expelled it was wrong because how application was submitted to principal.Means,principal forced my father to write application.Means,i was not wrong ,so he forced to write instead of my expulsion.

11.It is said in complaint of dt.13.9.2012 that she had filed complaint already on 21.9.2011.But in the said alleged complaint of 21.9.2011,the she has signed on 23.9.2011.Her lawyer has signed on 21.9.2011 and typist has written 21.9.2011.If complaint was filed on 21.9.2011,then how she signed after two days? This proves,the complaint was filed in back date after 5 months and artificially was shown 21.9.2011 ,not in date of 21.9.2011 in real,so because of confusion in which date she has to sign,she signed in date of two days after or it was forged in back date,so she was perplexed by the fear and tension of forgery and signed in date of two days after.

Read Comments

    Post a comment

    Leave a Reply