Menu
blogid : 8093 postid : 378

Corruption Can Hang Someone

VISION FOR ALL
VISION FOR ALL
  • 270 Posts
  • 28 Comments

Money Security and Prestige Equilibrium

Money Security-A hypothesis can be understood as giving guarantee of money to all citizens by birth-first remuneration,then work.Here,work is dependent on remuneration,not remuneration is dependent on work.
Pre-remuneration system or open equilibrium operation means give first salary to all as a guarantee through ADHAR card and then work.There are some troubles alongwith this scheme.Pre-remuneration as a guarantee can be provided to those who works under Govt or any company or remains unemployed or works as labour.But how pre-salary will be provided to those first who are the master of their firms like self-employed or personal enterpreneurship. Firstly,for poverty eradication pre-remuneration system is the first,last and best way.After pre-remuneration,one can work under govt scheme,hypothesised collective industry,be self employed but income from this work will be reduced from pre-remuneration. Those enterpreneur like industrialist,who have already money security can’t be kept under this system.But workers and officers of such enterpreneur will be kept under this system so that they could have money security.Money invested for these workers and officers by Govt will be taken by Govt from industrialist.In case of small enterpreneur also,this will be implemented against its owner.Ownership of an enterpreneur will not be kept under govt by displacing its master and paying a guaranted money so that the productivity or efficiency of a firm/enterpreneur could be kept continued.For all remainings,this system can be implemented without any troubles.There will be money guarantee of a person even that person remains unemployed,but no one will be so because we will have such work opportunity.All human is equal so for all works,there will be equal remuneration.
Now,two questions will arise-1.By birth,if pre-salary is paid,a person will not work.
2.If there will be equal salary,there will be no will power in a person whose work/designation has been accepted higher.
Both questions can be solved easily.We will be living in such society,which will be totally compacted due to IT and such all and perfectly organized due to all strong democratic mechanism.Personally,i don’t want prestige and prestige is only a psycho fear.But people want and this will motivate them to work to compete with others to get higher post.So everyone will work.There will be will- power also because a people will want to show its potency because no more money will be to show due to equal salary- ”prestige equilibrium.”.Now prestige equilibrium will be a new term in economics that ”when all human resources of an economy possess approximate equal income ,the prestige of all human resources become same.In this condition,a human resource wants to work better to compete with others and to show its skills to get prestige on this economicless ground.” Slowly and gradually,all industrialist will come under the ambit of prestige equilibrium due to decentralization of corporate sectors to its lower level by collective form of small firm and remainings black money holders will not be escaped due to IT-connecting ADHAR Card with a governing body.IT and Communication sectors and such few sectors can be decentralized only at partial level.But maximum sectors can be decentralized at maximum level.First of all,there will be need of such scientists and engineers who can invent such machines/devices/technology which can give same productivity of same quality at same cost in this collective small firms.Then we will have surely full work opportunity to give work to all and implement this open equilibrium operation and such many.
This can be implemented even in present without ADHAR Card.But it requires proper calculation of population,their economic background and work.Firstly,even in present or for connecting with ADHAR,an autonomous agency working to all blocks will have to establish,which can calculate data properly..Present teachers,Aganbari,Panchayat Sachiv etc can’t calculate proper data.There must be an autonomous agency like UID,but working even at block level.

There are many easy and alternative ways to prove innocence and catch false case.Principal forcibly utilized a widowed lady against me and labelled many false allegations against me which can even prove that allegation of unnatural act is false also.

Below are written in the forged complaints manufactured in the name of DM and SDO.

1.The said lady or the mother of that boy was being threatened by my men through telephone.But both numbers,which were used for threatening are fake as costumer care says and call made to the No was not known by me.

2.Through two mob No starting with 92,she was threatened by my father and mother after calling her on the day of my absconding that she and her son will be not ignored.But she herself called and both No starting with 92 were at home and my father was at JNV Samastipur,not at home.This could be said her to not leave/ignore her legally,which anyone can say.But this is written as the complaint.Her son was not trapping me and was so small,so couldn’t be said regarding her son.
3.Her son was being tortured even after summer vacation by me and principal sent me home for mental treatment!She herself is accepting that i was leave because principal sent me home.Then how her son was being tortured during this time.However,principal has written in report that i was willingly leave,not sent and i was leave for heart-based treatment not mental.
4. The mother of that boy was trapping me falsely so i sent her SMS and emails to keep my favour and i have right to keep my favour.But she went to say that i have disturbed her by doing such.She was an offender as she was trapping me.Even being an offender, she went on to say such which was baseless because i kept my favour and she was not listening me through phone by cutting and not coming for justification.So only SMS was an option to get the right,which i applied.She was saying wrong so contradictory statements have been presented in papers.Principal wrote falsely that i sent SMS/emails to that boy and blackmailed and mentally tortured him.She didn’t clear in one paper,for whom SMS/emails were sent but was being blackmailed and mentally tortured her son.In one another paper,she has said that i have threatened her to send her SMS and emails. In his written complaint,the boy has not written about SMS and emails after of summer vacation.Which one is true?So everything is false.

5.Principal has written that a teacher prohibited me to not sleep alongwith that boy and i became argumentative to that teacher.The boy has written that the said teacher prohibited him to not go outside room after 9 P:M and i became argumentative to teacher. Whom he prohibited,what he prohibited and when i became argumentative?There is contradiction so allegation is false.

I have already proved allegation of unnatural offence false separately.

Principal has utilized her mother to alleged in such way to show so many other crime records,so that i can be trapped easily in unnatural
offence.Secondly,this is written to protect the principal by labelling so many allegations.

DM and SDO,these are two barriers against whom no one wants to listen and Human Rights Commission closed the case forcibly due to these two also.But SDO is directly involved to protect principal.DM may be involved but his two lower officers namely OSD and grievance officers are involved.Please see evidences.

SDO has received complaint and ordered for FIR even when case of same matter was already going on in the Human Rights Commission,which is his higher authority.So SDO had no right even to receive complaint.On 13.9.2012,when complaint was filed,18 months were passed.Principal has presented before Human Rights Commission complaint of Sept 2011 done to SDO.But here,SDO is saying 2012.This means,forge paper of 2011 was presented and to depress this conspiracy,complaint was filed after one years approx in same date.In fact,complaint of 2011 is forge because no date,case No and seal is available regarding this complaint.One official has signed two days before of the signing by applicant mother.Response of RTI and contempt notice which i have sent to SDO will give some evidences also,which i am waiting.

No one document was available against me till the time of taking TC.So from where all papers came.These are managed in back date.Grievance Officer has issued order.When i asked DM regarding this order by a notice by pointing out that order is issued after 6 months having no action taken,OSD replied something different.This proves,that order is wrong and conspiracy.Secondly this proves either principal prepared forge order or District Administration helped too.So to divert the issue,something different replied.This is replied that action taken against me by principal is right and this is accepted by my father.This proves principal expelled me and this was wrong because principal said that i was not expelled and SLC was issued on parents request and in the case of expulsion,no application should be submitted.This proves my father was forced to submit,if forced to submit means expulsion was wrong.When i asked OSD,What action is taken against me,what my father accepted and how action taken can be right only on ground of report submitted by principal and without medical test,OSD refused to provide information.This proves,everything was conspiracy so OSD refused to provide information.The case was already under the consideration of Human Rights Commission so DM or OSD had no authority to state action taken right or wrong.OSD has replied same in response of some questions which principal replied.This proves,they are totally fixed.In the complaint filed before DM,the applicant who is the mother of boy,has signed one month before and application No and Seal is provided to the application after 3 days of filing complaint.This proves,complaint is managed in back date.

Many people has been bigot,extremist in nature.They have no dare to accept their faults and correct these.

Helplessly i had to send SMS to justice SN Jha with a request to open my case again by counting my evidences and processes not followed as he closed my case forcibly without listening my evidences and following legal processes.He is an offender in view of this.His mob No and of all members of Human Rights Commission are publicly displayed on the website of the National Human Rights Commission. So any citizen has right to contact with him through telephone.He could not talk through phone,this is bureaucratic mentality.So SMS is the easiest way to contact and i have right to request him to reopen the case.Accordingly,i requested by SMS.But he thought how i dared to send SMS,how i dared to arise questions against his decision.Even being an offender,he thought so and became ready to lodge FIR,but not lodged because he is guilty himself and i have right to request,which i applied. By mistaking SMS was sent to Justice Rajendra Prasad also because the last 3 digits of Justice Prasad No is 779 and Justice Jha No is 997.I have not sent him SMS,it happened by mistaking.Why i will send him SMS,i had work from Justice SN Jha,not from him. If someone sees this as sending SMS to higher authority,they have no understanding of right because i have right to request and mob No is publicly displayed.He is also a human,not higher.

One thing,i have done wrong.I have sent principal SMS and emails and i have sent message to two navodaya teachears who were involved in the conspiracy of principal,wherein i have said these rapist,commit suicide,perform unnatural act with their son etc.But i have only said.They have done such.They must be punished first.I have said such in over tension caused due to them.Remainings in all cases,i had right and they did wrong first so i said them to accept their misdeeds.Where i was wrong caused due to over tension,i said such also to realize the misdeeds done by them.

However,i have sent principal a lot of news related to case and reports,evidences and petitions which i filed/will be filed to higher authority,which ultimately helped/will help him.I have sent such helpful materials to that boy and teachers also.

Capital Punishment (Fansi) must not be given to 5 rapists of Delhi Gang Rape till Lok Sabha election 2014.Because govt wants vote by doing so.In fact,No fansi would be given to all 5 within few months,if there would be no election in 2014.But fansi is inevitable for all 5 before election-before code of conduct issued by election commission.There is same condition in the case of Afzal Guru and Kasab.
For the politics,govt play with the life of people (whether may be terrorist or rapist) and we start to support them.How much foolish we all citizens have been? We have no right to being a citizen.
Govt or any party or no one think about internal or external security,they are only doing politics.So don’t be misleaded by any party.For the politics,even they can hang now.
Govt or any party is 200 % corrupt,so by presenting another issue and showing work in such issue,they want to depress their corrupt activity and divert the people.It’s only conspiracy against common people.Mathematically,this can be said that to secure the corrupt activity,they can hang the people to divert them.

One deputy chairman of Raj Sabha and so many such are accused in rape cases and nothing is going to happen.

You know Afzal and Kasab has been hanged before election to obtain Hindu Vote Bank.Because BJP is going to challenge congress on ground of Hindu Vote Bank.
Someone is hanged due to vote bank,someone is hanged to flow communalism in the name of Hindu and we support them.
We are foolish.Whether may be congress,BJP,they are not worry about us and they only want bad politics.So don’t support anyone.
Afzal would be hanged earlier,if they would be worried.Such rapists would be hanged earlier if they would be worried.
Afsal and Kasab ought to have hanged after 2014 election.
Supreme Court must postpone the decision of hanging of 5 rapists till the time of 2014 election when the matter goes in this court,if Supreme Court doesn’t want to mislead and divert the people,doesn’t want to secure bad politics,doesn’t want to secure corrupt activity.

Simply,party doesn’t want to stop corruption, communalism etc and for this they can hang.

Tags:   

Read Comments

    Post a comment

    Leave a Reply