FDI in Retail : Evolution of neo colonialism

VISION FOR ALL

270 Posts
28 Comments

(Ideas presented in this article are applicable for other countries also)

America has forcibly established neo colonialism in some countries but India is itself opening the door of neo colonialism for developed countries,perhaps even may be colony also ,not only neo colony like Iraq and such.The most prominent reason behind FDI in retail is fiscal deficit and the reason of fiscal deficit is corruption.What India want? This time,due to fiscal deficit,FDI comes in retail.Now again corruption will bring a new fiscal deficit in future and this will bring again a new FDI in new area,may be like FDI in land…Now India will say foreign country to bring FDI in land or such area and Indian Govt will have no other way besides to bring FDI in land to tackle with fiscal deficit like this time of FDI in retail.FDI is not possible in land.So there will be FPI in land(Foreign Portfolio Investment).Even ,there may be FDI in land too because there will be small land of farmers and no more money,so a farmer will have to sell its land to foreign company(even may be big company of this country) and a farmer will work under these companies.

Now govt will invest foreign money in agriculture or foreign companies and few Indian Corporate Companies will buy the land and will have its ownership and a farmer will be slave. Because govt will have no money to invest due to fiscal deficit caused due to corruption. This will be more tremendous than British rule.In this way,we may be colony again like colony of British rule,at least neo colony is fixed.Corruption can slave us again. Fiscal deficit occurred even after globalization in India but Globalization was implemented mainly to fulfill the fiscal deficit but even after globalization,fiscal deficit occurred.So now even after FDI in retail,why no fiscal deficit will occur and now there will be FPI or FDI in land.

Implementing NEP 1991,globalization in India can’t be opposed because we need such productivity which can fulfill the demand of people and increasing population,such technology which can contact the people to whole world and such life style which can compete with modern world.So globalization was needed and opponent of globalization is opponent of development.But opponent of FDI in retail is real supporter of development. Globalization was needed for the all above purposes ,but now there is no such purpose can be counted by any which can be fulfilled by FDI in retail.So FDI must be resisted.

The thinking behind implementing globalization is initially related to establish dominancy to weaker country by developed country but the thinking behind implementing FDI in retail is totally related to establish dominancy to weaker country by developed country because in FDI in retail,there is no such purposes which have been counted above and which are attached alongwith purposes of globalization.

We have adopted only a centralized form of globalization.In this form,there is global participation of only big companies economically.We can decentralize globalization to the lower level by the investment of these companies of foreign and our country for the collecting form of small companies by the participation of common people.I have presented this model initially and termed as ‘separation of economic power.’ Please go to 648rahul.jagranjunction.com and sanjeevsuman.jagranjunction.com and search all related blogs.You may search such articles in my all facebook accounts/pages/groups also.

Similarly,this time we could implement such model of FDI in retail or multibrand retail even by big companies of India which would be collective form of some retail shops of a particular area and shopkeepers would be its owner and such companies would have its dividend of profit.

If such model of globalization,we will implement,there will be no corruption,unemployment,fiscal deficit,inflation,environment problems etc,etc.

Similarly,if such collective retail will be implemented instead of multibrand retail ,which I have presented above,everyone will get benefit and there will be no fiscal deficit again.Unless,there will be always fiscal deficit due to corruption and this will destroy the economy.

Why always capitalist are always owner in macro economics or large scale economic activities? Why common people like shopkeepers,labours can’t be owner in large scale economic activities alongwith capitalist,not only capitalist or not only common people.
There is need of above model where everyone will be owner of a firm.

Now capitalist has been owner of shop after industry,now will be of land and everything..So stop and start revolution for this….