VISION FOR ALL
- 270 Posts
- 28 Comments
Bihar Human Rights Commission didn’t listen me
I AM GIVING TIME OF 10 DAYS.WITHIN THESE 10 DAYS,IF BIHAR HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION [THE BHRC] WILL BE READY TO HEAR UPON THE MATTER AND GIVE ME AN OPPORTUNITY TO KEEP MY FAVOUR THEN I WILL RETURN BACK.UNLESS,I WILL NEVER RETURN BACK.THIS WILL BE BETTER TO DIE IN PLACE OF RETURNING BACK. IF THERE WILL BE HEARING AGAIN IN BIHAR HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OR SOMEONE HEPLS ME TO WRIT IN THE HIGH COURT/SUPRE ME COURT AS NEEDED THEN EMAIL MESSAGE OR MESSAGE THROUGH FACEBOOK CAN BE SENT TO ME AND THEN AFTER RECEIVING THIS MESSAGE BUT ONLY WITHIN 10 DAYS,I WILL RETURN BACK,UNLESS NOT.
Email-648rahul@gmail.com
Fecebook-rahul.kumar.9655806@facebook.com
Bihar Human Rights Commission didn’t give me justice
Whatever Bihar Human Rights Commission did is unexpected and have helplessed me to leave the Humanitarian Existence.Bihar Human Rights Commission will close case now by saying that the matter is not related to Human Rights or give verdict in favour of principal by saying that my objection against principal is wrong and i was wrong. The verdict will be given on the basis of my father application for the issuance of TC,which principal forced in front of my elder that if application will be not given then TC will be not issued and on the other hand,he would not keep me in school. The verdict will be given on the basis of the all complaints against me done by the mother of that child to principal,the mother of that child to Sub-Divisional Magistrate and District Magistrate,the complaint of that child to principal,the complaint of some teachers,but these all complaints are fake,artificial,prepared later in back date and these complaints are prepared in the date of 22 Aug 2011,24 Aug 2011,22 Sept 2011 and 23 Sept 2011.This means,these are prepared either after complaining against principal [MOSTLY]or on the date of my absconding or very few days before complaining against principal.As the all matters are of till March 2011[except SMS/emails incidents] so this can be said that these are complained after 5-6 months.
In the Bihar Human Rights Commission on 31 Oct 2012,this is said firstly whether there is any internal solution.I replied no. Again pretext changed and this is said that the matter doesn’t relate to human rights.I said that if principal will be called then I will prove everything.This is replied that this is not court. Again the commission that case will be closed as the matter doesn’t relate to human rights.I crossed and replied that that i am trapped forcely and this is humiliation of human rights.I was withdrawan and this is the humiliation.I was refused to opt humanities
and so on which humiliated my human rights.The pretext changed again and this is said that my father has himself given the application.I said,he was forced and given reasons as above.The commission was not believing this so i said him that my father is himself giving witness. The commission replied that this is not court.Only the issues of human rights are seen.This is said again that the mother of that child has also complained against me.I replied that these are prepared artificially in back date when i complained before you.. I stated,there are many faults related to date and there are many contradictory statements for a particular incident.I can prove everything.Again said that this is not court where you will prove. I kept focusing to all fake documents.I kept continuing to say that these are prepared later in back date.But the commission was not believing and saying that this is not court where you will prove.The commission further submitted why everyone will go against me.I submitted that I have more than 10 recordings of principal,I have recordings of some students and witness of more than 50 students.The commission again submitted that this is not court.Case will be closed.
I surprised to listen when commission stated that if this is assumed that you were expelled then also this was disciplinary action.I crossed and reply that I was trapped after complaining against principal and the matter is of March 2011.Again,I started to speak and commission remained silence.I started to say that if commission can’t take witness of any then I am able to prove everything in written.I have no need of witness to present.I have got witnesses through social media.I have got witnesses through recordings.Hon’ble Judge smiles then.I said,I am facing depression since last 1 -1 ½ years.I must have freedom from that objection.In the complaint of Sub-Divisional Magistrate,no seal,date and case no is present.By the reply of DM office,this is evident that the complaint is fake.After listening such things and by assuring him that I can prove everything then this is said that he will think upon this matter.Case will be closed or there will be hearing,this will sent to me by letter within very few days.
But by the expression of Judge and saying words by the “PESHKAR” after this discussion as PESHKAR was saying that case will be closed ,I am confirmed that the case will be closed forcely prejudicially and baselessly.
The commission only observed the report submitted by the principal.The commission didn’t try to look my report even for a second.When I said the commission that I have to submit more documents as response where I have crossed every complaints in detail as I was only sent the report of principal so I had submitted my response only in regard to the report of principal.But I received all complaints which were the enclosures of the report of principal by RTI and then prepared documents against all complaints.The Commission stated that I have already submitted a lot of documents but if I want then I can submit.There was only neglecting sense.As commission said that I will be sent letter whether case will be persued or closed after thinking upon matter what I said face to face,so I didn’t submit these all new documents which can disclose everything.So this is to be submitted.
In view of all above stated matter, this can be said that human rights commission has humiliated its power itself.
1.Witness can be given in the Human Rights Commission.
2.Accused can be called in the Human Rights Commission.Before my nacked eye,in the same court,SP and one other police officer was called.
3.The matter is related to human rights.If the matter was not related to human rights then why the commission received the complaint,why the commission took report from principal,why the commission took my response in respect of the report of principal.Now the matter doesn’t relate to human rights.
Why the commission didn’t observe the faults related to date in all complaints and many
Contradictory statements for a particular incident?How the commission said that If I was expelled then this was disciplinary action?Why the commission didn’t observe that if this was disciplinary action then why principal is saying that he didn’t expell me? Why the commission didn’t observe that if this was disciplinary action then why principal has prepared later a lot of fake documents to protect himself and create plus point against me?Why the commission didn’t observe that if this was disciplinary action then why such documents are prepared to show only and no action is taken?
Actaully,the commission was not free and fair so I became perplexed,confused and nervous when I was discussing before the commission but what I replied is competent enough to continue hearing instead of closing.I am able to prove every objection. I was saying and saying that I must have an opportunity to keep my favour .The commission was stating and stating that this is not court,my matter doesn’t relate to human rights.I assured that I can prove everything by written documents.Lastly,this is replied that the commission will think upon this.If I will be given an opportunity to keep my favour then I can prove everything.
1.The Issuance of TC on the request of my father
This can be crossed by many evidences.
The application for the issuance of TC had been given twice.One on dated 26.8.2011 from the NVS Headquarter and other on 28.9.2011.How the application can be given twice?How the deputy commissioner NVS,Patna can be reported twice?
By the phone recording of principal of dated:-4.9.2011,this is evident that application is given twice.By this phone recording,this is evident that principal is going to expell me.9471090180 to 9431691667 conversation held where recorded.
By the fax and call details records,this can be analyzed that application had been given on 26.8.2011 also.As SK Gurg firstly talked to principal by saying to forward my application to DC and he talked to DC to say to sign.As SK Gurg sent a copy of this application through fax to the principal and principal reported to the deputy commissioner through fax.
I talked to Hindustan,Darbhanga and this was advised to talk to Hindustan,Samastipur.I called but the correspondent was not present.I sent principal email titled:-Cancel My TC on dated:- 5 Sept 2011 and said him to cancel the application dated:-26.8.2011. By the RTI response of principal of dated:-8.10.2012 in response of my RTI application of dated:-4.10.2012,principal has accepted that he has received this email.
For this matter,my father talked to principal on 3 Sept 2011 and 12 Sept 2011.After saying this by principal that I have complained against him,I have said him corrupt so he will not keep me in school,On 3 Sept 2011,my father talked to Girish Chandra and then to SK Gurg.9471090180 to 9431024821 and 9471090180 to 09868855597.Both of ACs refused to say principal.
I went to school alongwith my father on 14 Sept 2011.The location of Number 8809810789 and 9471090180 can be traced.From school,I called to SK Gurg after trapping and phone was not being received so I cut.
After this trapping,I sent principal emails to prove him corrupt in the assembly by saying to prove me wrong in the assembly as he was saying on 14 Sept titled:- Rahul Kumar, I want to prove you corrupt,Stating the decision of principal wrong by emails titled:- I am right,Nature has given a lot of emotion,It’s great.Within these emails,this is said that principal has trapped me forcely but that child was helpful for my project.This is said that I will case against principal to the high Court of Patna.
By the RTI response of principal of dated:-8.10.2012 in response of my RTI application of dated:-4.10.2012,principal has accepted that he has received these emails.
On 17 Sept 2011,I sent Hindustan,Muzaffarpur email by pointing out that principal has expelled me as I have complained against him and I am not able to writ to High Court so I expect active role.On 21 Sept 2011,Pragati Mehta talked with me through landline.Sanjay Katiyar sent me sms before this to call.Again,this team talked to the principal.Principal accepted that he expelled me due to the written complaint of that mother.This was informed to me by Sanjay Katiyar on 22 Sept 2011.8809810789 to 9771433950.
This proves following things:-
1.Principal trapped and expelled me.Because principal is saying that he didn’t do such.So principal has cheated media and understood media weak,helpless and toy of this system as principal didn’t keep me even after saying by media and then forcing my father to write application for TC to remove evidence.
2.No complaint was done to District Magistrate and Sub-Divisional Magistrate.Because principal informed only about the complaint of that mother done to principal as the reason of expulsion.So this complaint is fake and prepared artificial in back date by principal to protect himself.
3.No complaint was done to principal by that child,PK Acharya and GS Choudhary.Because principal informed only about the complaint of that mother done to principal as the reason of expulsion.So this complaint is fake and prepared artificial in back date by principal to protect himself.
So in my case,the evidence through media must be valid in the case,if i will be able to prove that such incidents like accepting of principal before media happened.I will be able to prove because i have call details record,SMS records and email records.
Media can help to give me justice.
In my case,media must not be observed only as media.Media have played a role of conscious citizen in my case and tried to keep me again in school.
This was not sting operation,TV sting but this was an active operation,which is greater than sting operation.
I had been fit.So I went to school on 23 Aug 2011.I had only normal heart based problems which was no more.I never consulted to cardiologist again after consulting once on 18 July 2011.There is no any base to say by principal that my father took TC on poor health ground.So baselessly,principal forced to write this in the view that I will face many problems now as he had trapped me.Whatever medical report is submitted by principal to the BHRC must be observed and matched to my medical report.Principal would prepare fake medical report also.
All things are explained in detail in my responses.
All complaints against me
There are many contradictory statements for a particular incident and many faults related to date,sign,seal,writing etc in all commplaints.
1.The complaint to the District Magistrate is of dated:-23.9.2011 but signed by the complainant on 23.8.2011.The complaint is sealed and application number is given to this complaint on 26.9.2011.The point may be noted here that the complaint is sealed and application No is given on the date of complaining.If this is assumed that complaint is done by post then this is not possible to seal and give application No to this complaint within 3-4 days. I have submitted application on 2.11.2012 to meet DM,Application No-10218.The application is sealed and application No is given immediately. This proves that the complaint is fake,prepared artificially in back date.This point may be noted also that the complaint is of Sept 2011-after complaining against principal in August 2011 and after of 6 months as all matters are of till March 2011.
I went to meet to DM but he was in meeting and this is said by staffs that he will not meet today so I submitted application.I want to know from DM whether complaint is done to him or this is fake so I went to meet.
2.In the complaint to Sub-Divisional Magistrate,no date,case no and seal is present.The complaint is signed by the applicant on 23.9.2011 but signed by an official on dated:-21.9.2011-two days before.This proves that the complaint is fake,prepared artificially in back date.This point may be noted also that the complaint is of Sept 2011-after complaining against principal in August 2011 and after of 6 months as all matters are of till March 2011.
3.The complaint of that child is written by his elder.No sign of that child is present.This is filed by PK Acharya as the enclosure of his complaint as PK Acharya has underlined some lines and this is written through the housemaster.The complaint of the PK Acharya is of dated 22.9.2011.So the sign of principal must be of 22.9.2011 but the sign of principal is of 20.9.2011. This proves that the complaint is fake,prepared artificially in back date.This point may be noted also that the complaint is of Sept 2011-after complaining against principal in August 2011 and after of 6 months as all matters are of till March 2011.In place of i/my/me/myself[mujhe],the name of that child is written or the name of that child is cut and then I [Mujhe] is written.This proves that complaint is written by someone else and that is the writing of his elder.
4.The complaint of PK Acharya is of 22.9.2011 but no sign of principal is present in the complaint.This proves that the complaint is fake,prepared artificially in back date.This point may be noted also that the complaint is of Sept 2011-after complaining against principal in August 2011 and after of 6 months as all matters are of till March 2011.
5.In the complaint of that mother done to the principal of dated:-22.8.2011,no sign of principal is present This proves that the complaint is fake,prepared artificially in back date.This point may be noted also that the complaint is of 22.8.2011-before very few days complaining against principal in August 2011 and after of 5 months as all matters are of till March 2011.In this complaint,the matter related to SMS/Emails are only current.So only complaint related to SMS/emails may be done on dated:-22.8.2011.
6.The complaint of GS Chaudhary is of dated:-24.8.2011.On the date of my absconding.The complaint was done in 23.8.2011 and this is made 24.8.2011 by any other.Why the complaint is not done before absconding? This proves that the complaint is fake,prepared artificially in back date.This point may be noted also that the complaint can be date in the date of absconding only to show that I was wrong so I ran away.So this is done to create plus point in the favour of that system and mislead the fact.There is only conspiracy everywhere.Principal was not present on 24.8.2011 but he has signed on 24.8.2011 on this complaint.This can be proved by the following evidences.
1.Principal reported to DC ,NVS Patna on 25.5.2011-next day.
2.Nisha Kumari wrote application to lodge FIR on the same date.
3.Nisha Kumari wrote application to my father on this day.
4.Nisha Kumari signed in the report of GS Chaudhary of this day,where my
absconding is narrated addressed to principal.
7.The report sent by principal to me by RTI which is said that this is sent to the Collectorate ,Samastipur by principal ,this is written that principal submitted a report of dated:-19.10.2011 on my withdrawal by my father on poor health ground in regard to the complaint of that mother done to the DM.But in the order of DM office of dated:-29.9.2011,principal has written this same and signed on dated:-18.10.2011-one day before. This point may be noted also that principal has written the name of the elder of that child in place of that child. This proves that the order and report is fake,prepared artificially in back date.
8.The number 8002699205,which is written by the applicant that she was threatened by a person and she believes that the person is connected to me,is of after Aug or Sept 2011.This thing is written in the complaint to the principal of dated 22.8.2011,in the complaint to the DM and the SDM of dated:-23.9.2011.But how the No 8002699205 is written before when the number was not activated.This not only proves that she was not threatened but this also proves that the complaints are fake,prepared artificially later in back date when I complained against principal to the Human Rights Commission.Because the number 8002699205 can be written only when this was activated.This is activated after such dates in which complaints are made.That’s why the complaints are done later. That mother has been forced,pressurized and threatened by the principal and his connectivity to do such fake complaints because why a mother will assist principal by complaining artificially, when I complained against principal.2 numbers which are explained by which she was threatened is not in use according to the customer care.
Only above noted faults are competent enough to prove myself right and principal wrong but there are many contradictory statements which also prove that objection against me is fabricated.
Contradictory Statements within these Complaints
1.There are many contradictory statements related to the objection related to that child.In the complaint of that child,nothing about unnatural offence is said.Even he is not confirmed whether I slept or not.Sometimes,he felt that I came to his bed when he was sleeping.There are 3 ways to feel this.1.He would be sleeping and I came to his bed and he knew when he awaked.2.He would awake in the morning and see me in the morning.3.He would be informed by someone else.
In the all above conditions,nothing like physical relationship is obvioused.
In the complaint of the mother of that child,this is said that his child informed her that I used to come to his bed at 10-11 P:M and he used to prohibit me but I didn’t listen that child.According to the statement of that child,this can be said that the objection of his mother is fabricated as she is saying different from her child.
In the complaint of PK Acharya,this is said that forcing a child to sleep with a senior is indisciplinary act.But that child has said nothing like this that he was forced to sleep.
In the report of principal,this is said that he was forced not live,not focused to sleep.
The all contradictory statement proves that I was trapped forcely.
The child has said that sometimes he also slept to my bed and when he awaked in morning then he knew that he was on my bed.This means,he slept as he came to my room and due to being child he got sleeping and then slept.If he would be living forcely with me and would be forced to stay on my bed at night and this would be resulted in sleeping then he would be known already instead of knowing in the morning.This proves,he was not forced to live and the objection of that child is fabricated and consequence of the pressure of principal.So this can be said that he was living willingly with me.That’s why my behavior was good as he said that my behaviour was not good.He himself is saying in the starting of the application that he became my friend and he is saying that [after 8 March 2011] when some boys complained to a teacher and that teacher complained to principal and principal said to minimize the time of living but now he didn’t want to live with me.This means,he wanted to live with me before this as he said that after this complaining,now he didn’t want to live with me.So he is saying false that he was forced in any form.Secondly,principal said to minimize the time of living this means,he was willingly living with me,he had no problem from me so he didn’t complain anything against me.That’s why principal could be able to only minimize the time.
GS Chaudhary,my house master has said that my roommate informed him but according to the child ,his roommates informed a sir[his associate house master] and all thing happened after this.So the statement of GS Chaudhary is false and fabricated.Secondly,if this is assumed that my roommates informed him about sleeping then why he didn’t complain to principal or my father then.Why he is saying this on the date of 24 Aug 2011?This proves,his statement is false and fabricated.
Why the child went to complain in Sept but the all matters were passed 6 months ago.The child has informed only about happenings as if he is writing his autobiography.This was complaint and a complaint must have an objective-what he wants to solve the problem,what action he wants.This proves that the complaint is written later in back date when I was not present then how he expects solution and action.
2.In the complaint to the sub-Divisonal Magistrate and District Magistrate,this is said that enquiry was conducted on 6 July 2011 and unnatural offence was proved.In the principal’s reporting to the deputy commissioner,this is said that an enquiry was conducted and house of child was changed.This means,unnatural offence was not obvioused because this would be said directly in his reporting.In the complaint of that child,this is said that my father meet to his mother before principal and I was directed to leave his accompany and he gave his application to change the house and changed.
This means,there was only meeting.Nothing enquiry was conducted.Nothing unnatural offence was cleared.The application for the changing the house is given by the mother of that child and even no sign of that child is present.This proves that the child had no problem and I was trapped forcely and this thing is written forcely by the principal.In this application,nothing like unnatural offence is written and there is no mentioning of enquiry.If enquiry would be conducted and unnatural offence would be obvioused then in this case enquiry report would be prepared by the principal.So everything is said false to protect the principal and create plus point against me.In the complaint of that mother done to principal of dated:-22.8.2011,only about sleeping is narrated.This means,she is saying false in the complaint to SDM and DM .
In the enquiry report of AK Tiwari,AC ,this is said , that mother has written on the basis of the statement of her child that I was doing unnatural offence.But the complaint of that child din’t say such.In complaint to principal of dated 22.8.2011,this is said that her son informed her about forcely sleeping and forcely staying on my bed.This means,her son didn’t inform her about unnatural offence.In the complaint to SDM and DM,this is said that by the enquiry this was proved [but I have proved that no enquiry happened .]This means,her son didn’t inform her.So there are a lot of contradictory statements and this proves that everything is false,fabricated and baseless.
3.In the report of principal to the BHRC,this is said that when BP Singh prohibited me to not sleep with that child then I became arguentative and illtreated with BP Singh.In the reporting of principal to the DC during absconding,this is said that BP Singh was facing problems as I slept many times.This means,he was only facing problems and he didn’t prohibited me and I didn’t illtreeated with him.In the complaint of the child,this is said that BP Singh prohibited him to not go outside the room after dinner and I started to argue with BP Singh. In the enquiry report of AK Tiwari,this is said that BP Singh prohibited me to not come to the hostel of that child by observing living ,eating and sleeping with that child,not only prohibited about sleeping as principal said.So there are many contradictory statements and this proves that I was objected forcely.
In fact,BP Singh was saying why he was living with me and had said thrice.So I talked with him to know his problems and he started to say who are you ,is your brother,family member,relative etc so I replied him that this is old mentality.He was prohibiting to eat together in mess and I replied him that there is no any rule to prohibit this.BP Singh stated false before principal when principal was trapping me so approx same statement is given by that child under pressure but principal made this more false.
4.In the report of principal to the BHRC,this is said that I sent that child objectionable SMS and emails.In the complaint of that mother done to principal,this is said that I sent SMS to her number and emails to the ID of that child.In this complaint,this is indicated that I have expressed negative mentally to her child.This is not said that I sent to that child.In the complaint to SDM and DM,this is said that I sent her SMS to threaten him.In the enquiry report of AK Tiwari,this is said that I sent emails to the ID of that child.Nothing is said,for whom this was sent.In fact,I was being trapped forcely but I have right to keep my favour so I sent her sms/emails to keep my favour.If she would listen me then I would not send her sms and emails.If I would be trapped due to evidences then I would not send sms/emails because there would be no right then.That child was in school and he had no mobile to open sms/eemails so this was sent to her mother to keep my favour and she knows to check sms and emails.
5.In the complaint to the SDM and DM,this is said that principal was giving me TC so i ran away.How this is said in this complaint?This proves that i was expelled so such is written in back date to prove me wrong. In this compalint,this is said that principal said my father to take me alongwith him to home and treat me mentally.This is said to prove me wrong.But principal is himself saying in his report to the BHRC that i himself gave application for leave on health ground.In this complaint,this is said that my father and mother called her from 9234283676 and 9234014790 and threatened..But she herself called and started to clarify her errors.So such contradictory statements prove that principal have done wrong so he started to object me in this manner to prove me wrong by the medium of this mother.
6.In the report of principal sent to the BHRC,this is said that by observing the gravity of situation and unsound health and behaviour of myself,my father took TC.In the enquiry report of AK Tiwari,this is said that his mother informed all thing to my father and thus my father decided to take TC.According to the report of AK Tiwari,this can be concluded that there was not such gravity of situation as he didn’t explain about complaint done to SDM and DM.So principal has prepared fake complaints-this can be said.This can be concluded that my health was not poor as AK Tiwari only explained about the informing of his mother to my father.So this can be said that principal has forced my father to write application on poor health ground. AK Tiwari managed with principal and protected principal.But an investigation officer can protect a person only to the extent of false witnesses .So principal only gave witnesses of that child,that mother and some teachers and what principal said,AK Tiwari wrote.But the compalint was fake so principal and his mother didn’t inform AK Tiwari by the mouth.But in the report of principal submitted to AK Tiwari,Annexure 12 and S.No.7 is present where there is explanation of complaint to SDM.So on the date of 12.2.2012 when principal submitted his report,principal could be able to prepare fake complaint addressed to SDM only.Between 12.2.2012 to 1.3.2012-before submitting report to the BHRC,principal prepared fake complaint addressed to DM also and included annexure 13 and S.No. 8 in his report.
If this is assumed that his mother informed my father then why she informed in Sept 2011,not before.So artificially this fact is presented to prove that his mother informed and my father took TC.If she informed before then why TC is taken after a large interval.This proves,i was trapped forcely so such facts are presented to show such situation at the time of taking TC.There is no evidence of this thing that my father was informed by her.After coming from Delhi,my father talked to principal only.There is no conversation and meeting described by principal with that mother.By the sms and emails sent to her,this is evident that i informed her and she was prejudiced.This is evident that i myself wanted justification but principal didn’t justify the objection.Her mother also didn’t come for justification.
This should be noted that principal has prepared mostly fake complaints on dated:- 22 and 23 Sept 2011.So this is prepared at the time of taking TC to show such situation where TC can be taken.
7.In the complaint to Sub-Divisional Magistrate and District Magistrate,this is said that the son of applicant informed her that her son was troubled by me.In complaint to principal,this is said that she came to know the friendship between myself and her son by some teacher and then she talked to her son and found insecured. In the principal’s reporting to DC,this is said that otherwise talkings were existing among the students and this led to the knowing of her.So such contradictory statements prove that everything is false.In this reporting,principal further submitted that when i couldn’t be able to alter the view of students and school management,i became offended,tried to hide my identity and left the school-ran away.Here,principal is directly indicating that i was trapped only on the basis of otherwise talking of students.Otherwise talkings can be evidence only when this is claimed by anybody that he observed wrong.But here this is obvioused by this reporting that there was otherwise talking only due to friendly relationship between 2 boys of 10 and 6-only due to prejudices.This proves that i was trapped prejudicially.
8.That child complained on 22 Sept 2011 then how the mother of that child complained before on 6 July 2011 and 22 Aug 2011 on the basis of the statement of that child.
This proves either i was trapped prejudicially or these complaints are prepared later in back date.
9.GS Chaudhary has complained on the date of my absconding and he has written that i ran away on 24 Aug 2011.If the complaint would be current then today would be attached alongwith 24 Aug 2011.This is written that i came on 23 Aug 2011.If this would be written current then this would be written yesterday alongwith 23 Aug 2011.GS Chaudhary has said that my father started to say on 24 Aug 2011 that i have been kidnapped and case will be lodged against principal and some teachers.If this would be current then this would be written that my father has said today /my father is saying that i have been kidnapped and case will be lodged against principal and some teachers.This proves, the complaint is prepared later in back date.GS Chuadhary has written today in place of 24.8.2011 in his reporting of my absconding to the principal.
10. In the reporting to the deputy commissioner,this is only said that the child has expressed his emotional problems due to me.This proves, he said nothing like he was sexually assaulted or forced to live.The complaint of the child is of 22 sept 2011 and principal reported on 25 Aug 2011,then how the child expressed his problems?Principal is himself saying that both of the boys were always seen together and i was maintaining close proximity.Then how he was forced? In complaint to principal by that mother in starting this is said that she came to know about access proximity by some teachers.This proves,everyone was known about excess proximity only.So whatever is written by everyone including that child and mother is false and fabricated.If everyone was known about excess proximity,this means that child had no problem.He never informed anything and informed only he was asked.This is surprising because if everyone was observing and talking about this proximity then why he didn’t inform his problem to any?In the enquiry report of AK Tiwari,nothing like forcing is written.There is objection to the excess proximity like living,eating and sleeping together.These all things where excess proximity have been objected prove that i am trapped only on the basis of prejudice and the boy is that if two boys of some age diffences live together having no family and social relationship can be wrong to the extent of sexual relationship.But i myself has been sexually assaulted by my one closed family relative.If there was no any prejudice then how the matter is bombarded and flashed only due to proximity where that child said nothing about sexual relationship and no one observed anything.This common sense must be observed.Only on the basis of sleeping,only very few times sleeping[I have proved this],not many times as principal explained ,I was trapped without such statement of child and any eye-witness.
As far as sleeping is considered, this can be said that a father sleeps with his son/daughter,a mother sleeps with her son/daughter.Is a father/mother homosexual/heterosexual with his/her son/daughter?If nature has provided same character to a father/mother like me and he/she can’t be wrong but I have same character but I can be wrong.This is only prejudice.Even a brother/sister/relative sleeps together but can’t be wrong and two person having no relationship can be wrong.This is only prejudice.
Principal has accused me to have a mobile but this is only the way to mislead the law by creating plus point against me.Principal and all teachers have mobile.If I can see BF by the mobile then principal and teachers have also same character naturally ,why they have mobile.As far as work is considered,I had to prepare power point presentation which needed internet and there was lack of internet facility then,I was working socially/ against corruption/educationally and this needed to contact with a person.Mobile minimized the time of contacting.I had some psychological needs also,which I have explained in my responses and its enclosures in details.As those boys were torturing and torturing created problems for myself and that child and in this way that child started to cut his contact to the human interaction and dipped himself in imaginative interaction of mobile,harry potter etc and this led him to not live without mobile game,use of internet,reading and watching harry potter and mobile was only the solution to keep him psychologically fit and this would ultimately lead to cut his contact from the imaginative interaction and join his contact with humanitarian/natural interaction.
Other Evidences
1.Evidences received through Awamanana Notice and RTI response of collectorate
No reply of Awamanana Notice according to my noted point:-
1.Why DM referred my complaint after 6 months and no action was taken against me 2 .but if he would refer immediately and action would be taken or 3.if action would be taken if he would refer after 6 months- then there would be solution in my favour due to medical test and other provisions which give me proper opportunity to keep my favour.No reply according to my notice clearly proves that if complaint is done to DM then this was wrong and conspiracy.
Now this has been proved that the complaint is fake by the reply of one officers of collectorate,Samastipur.This has been proved also that there is fixing between principal and some officers of collectorate lower than DM.This is proved because DM office has not supplied documents related to complaint by saying that principal has already supplied me.Here,the question is that the document is not supplied because principal has prepared fake documents so how the officers would supply documents.By supplying documents in this condition,they may trap themself also alongwith principal.But by not supplying and saying that principal has already supplied,they may protect principal also.This might be possible also that such officers helped principal to prepare fake documents so they didn’t supply.In this condition also,they protected principal and themself.Officers lower than DM have done such,it seems.
Collectorate has replied same line in response of my some questions which is replied by principal by stating that information sought is not information as per 2(F) of RTI Act,2005.Secondly,collectorate has replied the answer of such questions which are based on the questions where this is said that information sought is not information as principal replied.This proves,they are totally fixed.
As collectorate said that action taken against me by the principal is right and this is accepted by my father.So i sent RTI to collectorate and principal what action against me was taken and what my father accepted,how action was right without my favour and medical test etc.Same reply came from both that information sought is not information.But this is surprising that collectorate has said in reply of question that on what basis action was taken and send a written prove that principal has already provided this information and principal has provided this information in the sense that i was cautioned,house of child was changed,my father was called etc,etc.Now the question is that if there was talking only about cautioning,housechanging,calling parents etc then why not questions were replied what action principal took against me,what my father accepted etc.This proves the conspiracy and conspiracy is that firstly,principal reply such because he had said DM that he expelled me.Then he managed to lower officers than DM of collectorate and said to reply same.This proves i was expelled because why not information is provided what action taken by principal against me,what my father accepted if the collectorate itseeelf said that action taken against me is right and this is accepted by my father.
I am able to understand the conspiracy of these people.Now i have demanded the complaint of that mother,report submitted by principal in regard to complaint of that mother and now this will be said again that information has already been provided by the principal.I have demanded the document which prove action taken and this will be said-Not Available.I have asked what action is taken in regard to this complaint and this will be said that no action was requested as principal said in his RTI response.The order is issued on dated:-29.9.2011 but TC was issued on 28.9.2011.The order was issued on 29.9.2011 so that principal can say that i was no more in school and the problem of that child had already resolved so no action was requested..
Here,this should be noted that principal has not submitted report to collectorate according to my noted points or has not supplied me report which is said to sent by principal to collectorate according to my noted points.Principal has sent me this report through RTI which is same to the report sent to the BHRC.This proves that if complaint is lodged after 6 months having no action taken then this is wrong.Similarly,Same awamanana Notice was sent to that mother twice but she didn’t reply.This proves that if complaints are done to SDM and DM after 6 months having no action taken then this is wrong..
2.How prejudicially NVS officers protected that principal is disclosed by RTI.
A.K. Tiwari,AC of NVS patna was appointed investigation officer by Headquarter after the order of National Human Rights Commission to the secretary,Union HRD. The enquiry done by A.K. Tiwari is totally prejudicially affected and the officers of headquarter accepted this report to protect principal.
In this report which i received through RTI,this is said i was doing wrong with that child.I was not mentally fit .Such things are said on the basis of the application of the mother of that child and the application of that child but there is nothing in the application of that child and 3 applications of the mother of that child contradicts her own fact itself.Secondly,this can’t be said by an investigation officer.This can be only said by medical board.So A.K. Tiwari misutilized his right and said to protect principal under managing. Thirdly,how everything was said without listening my favour.
NVS,Headquarter said by accepting such condition falsely said by AK Tiwari that i was not expelled and due to that condition TC was taken by my father as Tiwari explained.Again, when i sent RTI application of 13 questions regarding my case,now this is said that enquiry report is very clear so no further action is proposed.How everything is said without my favour and related medical tests.This should be noted that this is said by headquarter even in the condition,when HRD sent 2 letters to NVS Commissioner with a request to look into the matter again as NVS had only considered the favour of principal and his side.HRD sent again the order of my case No.753/4/30/2012/OC under NHRC as this case No.[which was my report in regard to my complaint]was also forwaded to the HRD by the NHRC as per my request.But HRD didn’t take action at his level and showed carelessness or protected principal.I submitted report to the HRD in regard to the report of principal on 28 April 2012 and in subsequent times but this was not forwaded to NVS.Same 13 questions under RTI were sent to the HRD and firstlt,this is said that I have sent RTI to department of school education and literacy instead of higher education and copy is sent to NVS .I sent RTI again to higher education and now school education has forwaded application to NVS.If RTI should be sent to higher education then why school education again replied.
It seems very shocking to say how a widowed lady and her small sons are being utilized by principal by forcing to assist in his conspiracy and creating pressure by the officers and persons also who protect/help principal like AK Tiwari,some district level officers etc,etc.
However,the report of AK Tiwari has presented some facts which is said different for a particular incident-which is explained diffrent by others like principal,that mother,1-2 teachers,that child itself.So this has increased contradiction within a particular fact and thus proved conspiracy.
AK Tiwari has said, i went to Headquarter-which is not said by any to hide this thing that i complained against principal.This has given a good evidence as most of documents including complaint of that child and PK Acharya to principal and complaint of that mother to District Magistrate and Sub-divisional Magistrate are prepared artificially after the date of complaing against principal and before the date of issuance of TC.
In this regard,this point may be noted also that after the order of central information commission,NVS Headquarter has accepted that I complained against principal when I went to NVS Headquarter on 25 Aug 2011.
3.Evidences through RTI responses of principal
I have already proved fixing between principal and officers lower than DM by the RTI response of principal and collectorate and Awamanana Notice sent to collectotate and response of principal in regard to this Awamanana Notice.Some more evidences are collected by RTI.Principal has replied that information sought is not information as per 2(F) of RTI Act in responses of my questions why complaints were done to DM and SDM after such gaps,why not done immediately,on what basis complaints were done after such gaps,what medical report detected.This proves he has no answer.This can be possible only when he did wrong.Again,principal has replied same that my questions don’t fall under the purview of RTI Act when I asked the complaints of that child and PK Acharya are done to him after complaining against him,the complaints to DM and SDM are done after complaining against him,the complaint of GS Chaudhary is done on the date of my absconding.What are the reasons. This proves he has no answer.This can be possible only when he did wrong.Now principal has said that there will be no further correspondence if i send him RTI application.Same reply will be said by collectorate now,I already know this.This proves they have no answer.This can be possible only when they did wrong.
4.Evidences through phone recordings of principal
By the recording dated:-4.9.2011,this is evident that application has been given twice and principal is going to expell me as I am saying that you can’t give me TC if I complained against you,application is given willingly and will be cancelled willingly and principal is saying that whatever I want to say come to office and say .So principal is saying to ask him in the office why he is giving me TC if I complained against him,why he is not cancelling that application for TC of dated:-26.8.2011 if this is given willingly. By the recordings of dated:-5 May 2012,6 May 2012,9 May 2012 and 6 Aug 2012,this is evident that principal has prepared fake complained later as he cut the phone first on 5 May 2012 by abusing and saying in perplexed condition how I dare to ask on phone,again by saying always that come to office to know this.This means,I am not known about this so principal is saying to come to office to know about this.That’s why complaints are done later in back date.I have explained in details about these recordings in my responses.
5.Evidences through phone recordings of students and statements of students through social media
More than 50 students have sent messages/commented/liked in my favour and against principal including my roommates,his roommates,my housemates,his housemates ,students of different classes and hostels..This proves,principal trapped me forcely and principal has prepared fake documents to protect himself,create plus point against me and showing situation of taking TC. There are recordings of 6 students also which prove all above.
By these recordings and statements through facebook,many wrong action of principal is obvioused also .eg-he gave TC some boys on the basis of age but some classmates of these boys were more over aged.Surely,this was done as the parents of these boys would not give desired money.DM looked into this issue and he ordered principal to keep them again.He withdrew a boy 3 times for some days because he was muslim.He expelled a boy because he didn’t give an exam of class 8.He has started his occupation by organizing coaching classes of a coaching centre but the students wanted the coaching class of one other coaching centre which was not connected to principal but studying comparatively well.He has great hand in the leaking of JNVST question papers etc,etc.
6.Evidences through RTI application of Dated:-4.10.2012 and principal’s response of dated:-8.10.2012
I have already said that principal has accepted that he has received such emails like titled:- cancel my TC,I am Right,Nature has given a lot of emotion,I want to prove you corrupt,It’s great.In this RTI response, in regard to my all questions,principal has accepted that he has received email titled:-Regarding VISION 2047 and email Titled:-He [child name not displayed] is a child of wonderful reflection.As principal said that he has not in received of article of VISION 2047 so far but needs observation and in the report of AK Tiwari,this is also said that principal has not received.But principal has himself accepted in RTI response that he has received this article as this was sent to jnvbs@rediffmail.com from 648rahul@gmail.com
So now this can be said that if he has received such article then he has refused to allot humanities due to this article and humiliated right to freedom of expression,right to freedom of selecting occupation and right to equality of opportunity.
Principal has himself accepted that he has received that email related to the reason of living with that child ,Titled:-He [child name not displayed] is a child of wonderful reflection..So this is evident that the reasons were not considered and on the other hand,principal had no any evidence as I have proved above.That’s why I was trapped with him forcely.In one his RTI response of dated:-8.9.2012 ,principal has supplied these 2 articles also as these were sent to the email ID of that child and these were submitted to principal.In this way also,principal has received such articles.
I have sent principal,some teachers some lines via emails/sms/facebook like go and commit suicide,you are rapist,gunda,you will be hanged to death,go and perform sexual relationship with your son.These are sent after Sept 2011 and sence last 2 months,I have sent nothing to any.These were sent because I was facing excess trouble due to them and this resulted in sending such lines due to stress.I only said them but they did such with me.But I have also sent them news related to case,what report I submitted,what I have evidences,what they did wrong etc,etc.So I helped them also.I have sent such news,reports,evidences etc to the email ID of that child also.
Who is accused in real?
Principal is accused in real.Some boys used to torture myself and that child and when I complained against them,in revenge to this,they complained against me to his associate housemaster.The associate house master complained to principal and informed his mother.These boys only complained about sleeping and this is written in the complaint of that child also.After this,they complained to that mother and she complained to principal.In this processes,this is evident that some boys only complained about sleeping and there was nothing role of that child.The complaint of that child says same facts too.So this can be concluded that I was being trapped due to personal problems,prejudices etc.It was principal,who could solve this problem but he always accepted the favour of my opponents because he was facing problems as I was working against corruption and started to torture me.In this context,what he did can be narrated as under:-
I was working against corruption.So when i entered in eleventh,principal started to trouble me by always saying he would expell me.For example:-i wanted to opt Humanities and principal said that he would expell me if i would opt humanities[ due to a philosophical article and working against corruption].Principal had already kept me trapping in a very wrong objection[physical relationship with a junior boy who was my friend] but i was saying to justify and he never justified.Principal never justified in this view that i would be bound to take TC due to that objection.I was living in tension due to these aforesaid reasons and principal again said that if i would be in tension,he would expell me.Anyhow,anyway,he wanted to not see in the school.
Such reasons bound me to complain against principal to NVS,Headquarter.In revenge to this,principal trapped me with that boy as i complained against him.
Now he is saying,he didn’t expell me in one hand.On the other hand,he has kept a lot of fake documents[complaint ] to show that i was doing wrong .Such documents are artificially prepared by principal then,when i lodged case against him.I was nothing wrong.Even that boy was helping me in my project.You may see such ideas in my group-Join For A New Idea,my page:- within a new idea and my blogs-648rahul.jagranjunction.com.
So this can be said that principal bounded me to ran away and I had to ran away,even after this principal trapped me .How much he had been brutal?I was tortured a lot.A small child was tortured due to living with me.That child was too helpful for my project.In spite of this,I was trapped and the BHRC is considering nothing.I can’t tolerate that objection more at any cost.I was tolerating due to human rights commission and human rights commission has broken all expectations.
Common sense to be applied
1.If I would be wrong then I would not lodge case against principal.
2.If I would be not expelled,I would not lodge case against principal.
3.If I would be known about these complaints which are done against me then I would explain about this in my complaint against principal of dated:-19.10.2012 and centralize my case according to these complaints.In my email reports to HRD of dated:-22.3.2012 and to NHRC and BHRC of dated:-21.3.2012,I would explain about these complaints as I was not known so I didn’t explain.In my report to NHRC and BHRC of dated:-24.2.2012,I would explain about these complaints if I would be known.i came to know on 19 April 2012,when I received the 5-paged reports of principal from the BHRC.
These all incident prove that I was totally unaware about these complaints.That’s why these are prepared by principal later in back date.
4.That boy said nothing like homosexuality and no one claimed like homosexuality.Then how the matter is bombarded and flashed.This proves conspiracy and I was trapped forcely.
5.Complaint is done to SDM and DM but no action is taken against me.This proves,I was trapped forcely and there was no evidence against me so no action is taken.Moreover,this proves that the complaints are fake ,prepared later in back date where I was no present so no action is taken.I stated this before the BHRC on 31 Oct 2012.
6.There is not only complaining of that child,but there is complaining of his mother,PK Acharya,My housemaster,BP Singh[only oral] etc but no action is taken against me. This proves,I was trapped forcely and there was no evidence against me so no action is taken.Moreover,this proves that the complaints are fake ,prepared later in back date where I was no present so no action is taken.
7.Why mostly complaints are done in in Sept 2012-before very few days of issuance of TC?Why one is done on the date of absconding and on is done 2 days before of absconding?If this is said that I ran way on 24.8.2011 due to the complaint of that mother of dated:-22.8.2011 then I have already proved that this complaint is baseless as her son complained on 22 .9.2011 but she complained on 22.8.2011 on the basis of the statement of her son.In this complaint,no sign of principal and that child is present.Moreover,nothing like unnatural offence is narrated.So this can be said that I was trapped forcely and the policy of principal bounded me to ran away.If this is said that physical appearance is not needed so there was no need to ran away.Then I would like to say you that I had already sent email to NVS,Patna on 17 and 18 Aug 2011 [nvspatna@rediffmail.com] titled:-Emergency:-Regarding irregularities of JNV Samastipur focusing my personal problems.But no action was taken and after this email also principal kept torturing and I ran away.This system bounded a person like me to ran away.Now again I am ranning away.What action is implemented by any?Whether it may be BHRC,HRD,NVS etc.
What the BHRC should do?
By the all above evidences,this can be said that my case can be accepted by the Bihar Human Rights Commission and there can be further hearing in the commission.This must be considered by the BHRC how a principal has been too brutal where he traps a boy with an another boy but that boy is helpful for the project of accused and there is no evidence against accused.This must be considered by the BHRC how principal is protected by everyone whether it may be HRD,NVS,DM office etc. How a principal forced a father to write application,a mother to complain by the power of money and accessibility,how a principal took complaint forcely by a boy against his friend,how some teachers are utilized by principal.After all,this must be considered how a principal dared to stop a new ideology. I myself has already been the victim of ‘’Human Phobia.’’The policy of the BHRC has made me more victim.There is only suppression among the human beings.Now even a boy is trapped with a other boy.How such slavery can be tolerated?I never observe society what people think and say.I always observe only slavery.I always observe what I lost due to slavery.I have a dream to work for a new philosophy to change the human set up as I am working for the new models of everything whether it may be economy,democracy,judicial system,religious view and everything.But there is only suppression among the human beings.Such suppression can’t be tolerated more now.I can’t say anything more.Bye…I want to forget human beings whether I have to loss my existence.
A lot of evidences have left still,which I have not explained but these are available in my responses.
Read Comments