VISION FOR ALL

Rahul Kumar

275 Posts

32 comments

Reader Blogs are not moderated, Jagran is not responsible for the views, opinions and content posted by the readers.
blogid : 8093 postid : 320

85 cases against that most corrupt principal

Posted On: 18 Mar, 2012 Others में

  • SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

85 cases against that principal.Either i must be hanged or he.
19 February 2012, 08:34:20 | 648rahul
On 14 Sept 2011,Principal trapped me only due to doubt and expelled
due to a written complaining against him and that complaining was due
to personal tyranny created by the structural effect of corruption for
me due to the corrupt activities of principal.
In view of this, he must be prosecuted for:-
1.Capturing my right to education.
2.Trapping me by creating conspiracy.
3.Capturing my right against exploitation.
Principal trapped me after complaining against him.
In view of this, he must be prosecuted for:-
4.Capturing my right of living security. I can’t be helpless and
insecure in such way where i can be trapped and expelled when
principal wants. This living security refers to the acquisition of my
right to equality of similar opportunity.
Because I can’t be helpless and insecure in such way where my similar
opportunity of acquiring education can be lost. I can’t be deprived
from this similar opportunity of acquiring education, when principal
wants. In view of this, if I was wrong, action must be taken against
me before complaining against him.
5.Humiliating the code of conduct of an institution. Because if i was
wrong, i must be expelled before. I can’t be expelled according to the
selfishness of the head of an institution.
The related happenings along with that written complaining was mailed
to Hindustan , daily news paper and attached.
Principal didn’t allot me humanities stream by reading my
philosophical article of VISION 2047 and imposing the condition that i
would be expelled if i would take humanities. Earlier he had accepted
on 29 March 2011 but refused on 26 June 2011 by imposing condition of
withdrawal in the condition of opting humanities.
In view of this, he must be prosecuted for:-
6.Capturing my right to freedom of expression.
7.Capturing my right to freedom of selecting occupation.
The related mail of VISION 2047 is attached.
On 23 August 2011, i said principal to justify all objections. Instead
of this, he imposed two conditions of living:-
“If i would live in tension, i would be expelled.”
“If i talk with Sanjeev, i would be expelled.”
In view of this, he must be prosecuted for:-
8. Behaving with me as a slave. This is the acquisition of my right to
equality of similar opportunity.
Later he stated that he said about my living in tension in front of my father.
So ,in view of this,he must be prosecuted for:-
9.Creating helplessness for a father to accept this behaviour of
slavery-this acquisition of right to equality of similar opportunity.
There was the principle acceptance of NVS, Headquarter in my favour.
But principal trapped me and expelled.
In view of this, he must be prosecuted for:-
10. Misutilizing his power by showing dominancy for my expulsion by
capturing the right of NVS, Headquarter.
11.Misutilizing his power by trapping me by capturing the right of
NVS, Headquarter.
Because principal had only the right to keep his favour, as principal
did. I went to NVS, Headquarter, New Delhi on 25 August 2011 by
absconding from school on 24 Aug 2011.It was now under the
consideration of NVS ,Headquarter. So principal misutilized his power
by expelling and trapping me.
On 23 Aug 2011, when principal imposed two conditions of living ,i
informed him such other conditions of sleeping. In spite of this, he
only trapped me on 14 Sept 2011 after coming from NVS,Headquarter. Of
course, everyone must be alerted only.
In view of this, he must be prosecuted for:-
12.Adopting protective policy to such other conditions.
13.Trapping and expelling me due to his individual problems.
Principal had been informed about the organisational form of torturing
created by those boys.Even some teachers tortured. But principal
didn’t consider. I had to face a lot of heart-based and psychological
problems due to oppressions and that objection. Instead of considering
about the organisational form of torturing, principal utilized those
boys as a medium for his wrong works. Those boys had complaint on 8
March 2011 for his protection against torturing when i wanted to
complain against them, but not on that manner as principal presented.
Even those boys had the wrong presentation of oppressions also. I had
informed principal about that wrong presentation of oppressions to
Sanjeev which was more wrong than my very few days circumstantial
sleeping because i was not wrong.
In view of this, principal must be prosecuted for:-
14.Adopting protective policy to such torturing.
15.Adopting silence acceptance for my torturing. And due to me, for
the torturing of a small boy. I had to feel the sense of helplessness
due to his torturing because he was being tortured due to me. Due to
this sense of helplessness, I was being tortured mentally and
emotionally. It was my double torturing.
Now, the principal must be prosecuted for his unreasonable
carelessness and non-cooperation.
In view of this, he must be prosecuted against his eligibility as a biologist.
Because principal is PGT, Biology.
16. Due to his sense of non-cooperation, he imposed the condition:-
“If i would live in tension, i would be expelled.”
This is not the responsibility of a biologist to distress more a
distressed student.
17.Due to his sense of non-cooperation, he trapped me but i slept due
to my heart-based and psychological problems created by current
oppressions effects. There must be such sympathetic understanding for
a principal as a biologist.
18.Due to his sense of non-cooperation and carelessness, he didn’t
consider about that organisational form of torturing. At least on 23
Aug 2011,when i said about the current torturing of Sanjeev due to me,
he must considered. But he didn’t .On 14 Sept, it was inevitable to
consider because i was being trapped so due to me, he could be teased
more and more. But principal didn’t. This is not the responsibility of
a biologist.
19.On 23 Aug 2011, i demanded principal to justify all objections. But
he didn’t. I wanted freedom from depression so i said. But he wanted
suffocated situation for my withdrawal so that my depression could be
increased and i could be bound to take TC. So he didn’t justify. If he
would justify, i had not to far away Delhi on 24 Aug 2011. This is the
mass non-cooperation and carelessness of a biologist.
20.Due to misleadership and misguidance of those boys, his mother
complaint written to principal on 31 March 2011. From April to June, i
was leave due to summer vacation .On 6 July 2011,when i admitted on
Eleventh after Summer vacation, i didn’t say against my objection in
front of his mother because i wanted proper settlement for Sanjeev
because his mother wanted to withdraw Sanjeev,so focusing to his
psychology, all round oppressions ,etc, etc could create irritation to
system for his mother along with irritation towards me. In fact, i was
known about his mother doubt only and she was expressing his doubt in
front of principal on 6 July 2011.When i entered principal chamber,she
didn’t say anything about sleeping.So I didn’t want to say anything
against her doubt because i wanted proper settlement of Sanjeev,as i
have described.But i myself was saying in front of principal that his
mother didn’t want to keep Sanjeev due to me. In spite of this,
principal didn’t consider anything. This is the unreasonable
carelessness of principal. He must try to consider problems-why such
problems created for Sanjeev? Why i myself was saying? This is not the
responsibility of a biologist.
21.We had to face a lot of problems due to Sanjeev’s psychology
created by all round oppressions and Harry Potter effects. I had also
to be tortured a lot .So I was also facing psychological problems due
to these two reasons.So there was nothing possible to go on that wrong
manner of sexual relationship. But principal didn’t consider anything.
This is the unreasonable carelessness and non-cooperation of
principal. This is not the responsibility of a biologist.
Due to his unreasonable carelessness and non-cooperation, principal
has no eligibility as a principal for a system.
In view of this, he must be prosecuted for:-
22.Non-believing to such organisational form of torturing by those
boys. But this is common in a system like JNVs. This is the
unreasonable carelessness and non-cooperation of principal. This is
non-understanding of a system by a principal.
23.Non-considering to such other sleepings but others were also the
part of that system. This is the unreasonable carelessness and
non-cooperation of principal. This is non-understanding of a system by
a principal.
24.Capturing the right of headquarter by trapping and expelling me.
Due to his dominancy, he forgot the understanding of the
organisational structure of a system. This is the non-cooperation from
system by a principal.
25.On 23 Aug 2011,i demanded principal to justify all objections. But
he didn’t.I wanted freedom from depression so i said. But he wanted
suffocated situation for my withdrawal so that my depression could be
increased and i could be bound to take TC. So he didn’t justify.If he
would justify,i had not to far away Delhi on 24 Aug 2011.This is the
mass non-cooperation of a principal for a system.
26.On 6 July 2011,principal didn’t consider anything .(as described in
case no-20) In this condition also,he didn’t try to reach to the
original problems. This is the non-cooperation and carelessness by a
principal for a system.
27. We had to face a lot of problems due to Sanjeev’s psychology
created by all round oppressions and Harry Potter effects. I had also
to be tortured a lot .So I was also facing psychological problems due
to these two reasons.So there was nothing possible to go on that wrong
manner of sexual relationship.But principal didn’t consider anything.
This is the unreasonable carelessness and non-cooperation of
principal.Principal must understand that how much problems that system
had created.Principal must understand that how his system was creating
suffocating situations.So This is the mass non-cooperation and
carelessness of a principal for a system.
There is the acquisition of right to life by principal.
In view of this, he must be prosecuted for:-
28.Trapping me only due to doubt by creating conspiracy. He was only
with whom, i was living. Besides this, he was so helpful for the
creation of my philosophy. So i am not able to tolerate this
objection. I would not like to lead life.Principal killed me
spiritually. In this way, principal has captured my right to life.
29.Imposing these conditions:-
“If i would live in tension,i would be expelled.
Principal had beed informed about my heart-based problems and
depression.In spite of this,he imposed this condition.On that
condition,i could do anything.Principal killed me psychologically.This
reason was the most prominent reason of my absconding.

“If i would talk with Sanjeev,i would be expelled.But i had said for
justification and he didn’t.In this way principal killed me
emotionally.

”If i would opt humanities stream,i would be expelled.”In this way
principal killed me ideologically.

So it can be concluded that by imposing these 3 conditions,principal
captured my right to life.So if i would commit suicide after these
conditions of withdrawal/living and accuse principal for this,then
principal would be impriosened.But i went to Headquarter so principal
is not impriosened.

So this can be concluded that the incidence of trapping me after
complaining against him is double capturing of my right to life by
principal.

Principal utilized Sanjeev’s mother as a medium for his protection
against wrong work by referring to the written complain of his mother
in front of Hindustan,daily news paper.Principal never informed me
about that written complain.Only due to doubt,principal trapped me on
14 Sept 2011 by composing his mind-created idea of my regular sleeping
with Sanjeev in the absence of his mother and only due to doubt,it was
complaint written on 31 March 2011.There must be benefit of doubt for
me because even no sleeping condition was obvioused. There was no any
eye-witness. If it is assumed that principal withdrew me on the basis
of that written complain,principal must follow process according to
that written complain instead of following the process according to
his composed idea. Also, principal must withdrew me before my going to
Delhi ,because i had said to justify all objections. I had also said
principal to call his mother . I myself had called his mother.But
nothing happened before my absconding. On 6 July 2011,i said nothing
against my objections. So i wanted to call his mother later after the
proper settlement of Sanjeev. But she didn’t come. Even by SMS and
email,i informed his mother about Sanjeev’s psychology created by
oppressions and Harry potter effects and problems created by these.
Even i informed her that Sanjeev had slept with his one senior of his
room for two days,who was involved in complaining. I informed his
mother about such other sleepings which were among the boys who
complaint, motivated to complain or support complaining.That means i
was focusing about the conspiracy of those boys. But she didn’t come
for justification,as i have called by referring to these issues.So the
case related to the objections of his mother had been closed on 23 Aug
2011 when principal didn’t call his mother. Principal could justify at
least by calling those boys.But he didn’t.So all cases related to the
objection of those boys had been closed also.So justifying on 14 Sept
2011 by calling those boys can be termed as only conspiracy of
principal. If i would be withdrawn due to the written complain of his
mother in the presence of his mother or at least due to the acceptance
of his mother, it would be termed as the helplessly participation of
his mother for principal’s conspiracy because earlier i had called his
mother for justification, requested principal to call his mother but
nothing happened so. But, i would be objected on 14 Sept due to that
written complain due to the individuals problems of principal.There
was no acceptance of his mother and she was not present. So it can be
said easily that principal has utilized his mother as a medium for his
wrong work because principal could do anything against me due to that
objection before my going to Delhi, NVS, Headquarter, as i had said
him for justification,but on 14 Sept 2011,principal justified by
calling those boys but nothing could be obvioused. His mother
complaint written on 31 March 2011 when I was leave.I knew it on 1
April, so I called his mother immediately,she came on 2 April 2011 but
didn’t talk with me .On 2 April 2011,just after his mother
complaining, i must be expelled because I myself wanted justification.
I can’t be helpless and insecure in such way where I can be expelled
when principal wants. I became leave From 3 April to 5 July 2011 due
to summer vacation. She came on 6 July{this day I was admitted in
eleventh and became special leave}but she didn’t say about sleeping,as
I have said in case no-20.Due to my heart-based problems, i was
special leave from 6 July 2011 to 22 Aug 2011.I came on 23 Aug
2011.But due to the dictatorship of principal, i had to far away Delhi
on 24 Aug 2011.In one hand,principal trapped me according to his
mind-created idea.On the other hand,he didn’t justify about sleeping
before my going to Delhi.This is the double conspiracy of
principal.Even principal has presented that written complain in very
exaggerated form.Because it was complaint only due to doubt.So can’t
be in very wrong manner.If it would be in very wrong manner,it would
be inevitable for principal to inform me about it.When i flew away to
Delhi and remained unknown,his mother was so afraid and had
sympathetic sense. If i would be wrong,it can’t be possible.So due to
unsociality of principal,principal has referred to that written
complain because he had trapped me on 14 Sept 2011 without proving
against me. On 14 Sept 2011,when i wanted reply on this condition:-
“I would be expelled,if i would talk with Sanjeev.”
principal replied that it was due to Sanjeev’s mother objection. Now
the question arises that due to the same reason,how i can be behaved
as slave first and later can be expelled. Only one thing can be
possible.Either i can be imposed by that condition or expelled. So
principal has done wrong. Even principal called a teacher to object me
due to his small problem. But he didn’t call his mother who would keep
his favour on that written complain.What is this indication?Even
principal didn’t inform Headquarter about his mother complaining.He
was informing his mind-composed idea of my regular sleeping with
Sanjeev.What is this indication?This indication is the indication of
principal’s conspiracy. This is also indication towards the
presentation of that written complaining against me by principal in
front of Hindustan in exaggerated form .Because principal didn’t
inform about it to NVS,Headquarter,because principal called a teacher
to object against me but didn’t call his mother.If that written
complain would be in very wrong manner then not only i would be
informed but headquarter would be informed also.His mother would be
called also. In one hand,no action against principal is taken due to
my written complaining against principal but it was sent to
principal.On the other hand,action is taken against me due to that
written complaining of his mother but at least i am not informed at
all.Is this justice?
His mother complaint due to misguidance of those boys but nothing
obvioused by the statement of those boys that means his mother written
complain is baseless and meaningless because those who complaint his
mother, witnessed in front of principal but nothing obvioused. So
,those witnesses are baseless and meaningless that means that written
complain is baseless and meaningless.

Even she started to clarify her errors when i flew away.So there would
be everything OK for me when there would be not principal’s pressure
and unsociality after principal’s complaining.Even i would be talking
with Sanjeev Suman after living in School because his mother had
changed her policy.
If i would not complain against principal,then i would be living in
School in spite of his mother complaining.
Was that written complaint not present when i called his mother for justification before my absconding?Was that written complaint not present when i said principal for justification on 23 Aug 2011-before my absconding?Was that written complaint not present when principal informed headquarter about my sleeping?Was that written complaint not present when principal trapped me on 14 Sept 2011.This might be also possible that principal would force his mother to write written complaint in very wrong manner after trapping me.

In view of this, principal must be prosecuted for:-
30.Utilizing his mother as a medium for his wrong work against me as
well as opening the door for the torturing and pressuring of Sanjeev
and his mother for the further wrong work against me by principal.
31.Capturing my right to protection. If he withdrew me according to
this basis,i must be provided opportunity to keep my favour in front
of his mother against her objection of sleeping.I have right to
protection in front of whom,who objects.I have right to keep my favour
according to that objection,due to which i am withdrawn.In view of
this,i had the right to keep my favour according to his mother’s
objection but principal objected according to his mind-composed idea
of my regular sleeping with Sanjeev.Still i am not known about the
mentioned objections on that written complain against me. Even he
didn’t give me opportunity to be cross-examined with his any
pressurised witness on 14 Sept 2011 .This is also the acquisition of
my right to protection. On 23 Aug 2011, he didn’t justify but imposed
two dangerous conditions of living. I must be provided the opportunity
to be interacted with his mother and those boys on 23 Aug 2011,when
principal imposed conditions of living. It was inevitable to give me
opportunity to be interacted with those boys and his mother because i
had to face a lot of psychological & heart-based problems due to those
all happenings. In one hand, principal utilized those who complaint
for his protection against wrong work. On the other hand, he captured
my genuine right to protection.Even when my father said that listen to
the statement of Sanjeev that he was saying that he used to see me at
morning.But principal assulted his dignity by saying that there was no
need for him to advocacy for me.In this way principal trapped me
prejudicially and captured me right of keeping favour.
Principal wanted my withdrawal anyhow.
One major reason behind this thing was that principal would face
economic loss due to my leadership. There is the leadership of
eleventh class in school and I am in eleventh.
In view of this, he must be prosecuted for:-
32.Trying to demoralize the leadership of a person.
33.Trapping me due to this also.
34.Imposing this condition of living due to this:-
‘’If i would live in tension, i would be expelled.”
35.Imposing this condition of living due to this:-
“If i would talk with Sanjeev, i would be expelled.”
36.Refusing to allot me humanities due to this also.
Principal had been informed about my philosophy and philosophical view
of living with Sanjeev.
In spite of this, he trapped me. But didn’t say anything to those who
oppressed a lot, didn’t say anything against such other conditions of
sleeping.
In view of this,he must be prosecuted for:-
37.Presenting non-developmental behaviour as a principal. This
non-developmental behaviour is not only the behaviour against a new
developmental philosophy but also the behaviour of familism, nepotism
and casteism. Because there is no society and family relationship
between myself and Sanjeev.That’s why prejudices were working and
these feelings opened the door for principal to trap me after
complaining against his corrupt activities. But such conservative must
know that i have become the victim of child sexual abusing when i was
of 5 years old. That one was non other than my one closed relative.
38.Trying to degrade the creation of my philosophy.
An email is attached which was mailed to principal to inform him about
my this philosophical view of living with Sanjeev.
There are also 9 behaviors of principal for this, principal must be
prosecuted for the humiliation of value system and dignity of a person
by suppressing that one.
In view of this, he must be prosecuted for:-
39.Depriving me to be cross-examined with his pressurised witnesses as
well as depriving me to interrogate myself according to that written
complain of his mother..On 14 Sept 2011,principal created conspiracy
but nothing could be obvioused on that condition also when he didn’t
give me the opportunity to be cross-examined with those very few
witnesses.When his one pressurised witness came,principal didn’t give
me opportunity to be cross-examined.Even principal withdrew me from
the principal chamber before the arriving of three witnesses,among
whom only one said but not according to the expecation of principal,so
i couldn’t listen the statement of that one.I knew about it later.This
is the another matter that by depriving me to be cross-examined with
his pressurised witnesses as well as depriving me to interrogate
myself according to that written complain of his mother,principal
captured my right to protection.The one matter is that by depriving me
to be cross- examined as well as depriving me to interrogate myself
according to that written complain of his mother ,principal has
suppressed me forcely.This is the humiliation of my value system and
dignity because i had been already understood wrong without proving
properly against me.So I couldn’t be understood as equal due to
prejudices. I have similar opportunity to prove myself right.This is
the acquisition of my right to equality of similar opportunity. There
was 14 roommates of Sanjeev. But out of 14,only 4 came and out of 4
only 2 stated. In spite of this condition, I was trapped and expelled.
There must be the witnesses of all 14.Also,there must be the witnesses
of 7 my roommates. Then decision could be taken.Even when my father
said to listen the statement of Sanjeev that he used to see me at
morning.Principal replied that there was no need for him to advocacy
for me.That means,principal trapped me prejudicially and captured my
right to equality of similar opportunity.
40.Trapping me only doubt to sleeping.On 14 Sept,he expelled me on
that condition where only doubt to sleeping was obvioused by the
statement of all witnesses. One boy was focusing to my knocking of
door for one day that means i didn’t remain in his room for night
after 9 P:M as one another boy{VISHAL KUMAR} stated.Because that first
boy {ADITYA MANHER}must be conformed about it. Sanjeev stated that as
bhaijee(his seniors who was his roommates and tortured) used to say
that i used to come but he was sleeping so he didn’t know…….that means
bhaijee was saying wrong according to a bhaijee [that first boy]
because he was focusing to knocking the door. That another boy must be
conformed by the mind-created trapping idea of principal. But he said
another and which was not obvioused by that first boy.Later,in front
of myself, that another boy accepted that he didn’t want to say
against me. That means, due to the fear created by the pressure of
principal and in front of principal, he said so. That another boy must
be conformed with the statement of that first boy.There was the
contradictory everywhere. So everything was wrong. So Sanjeev used to
see me at morning is right only. So only due to doubt,principal
trapped me. Have we any feeling of untouchability where only sleeping
can be the reason of trapping? This is the thinking, parallel to the
feeling of untouchability. This is the acquisition of my right to
equality.
41.Slapping me.After complaining against him,principal slapped me on
14 Sept 2011.If i go against the exploitation,one can’t have the right
to slap. This is the humiliation of my value system and dignity.
42.Threatening me.After complaining against him,principal was
threatening me by saying:-
“If you want your betterment, never come in front of my eye.”
“I am five times more lunatic than you.”

”If you will go behind me,i will go behind you.”
”You are going to degrade my dignity, i am going to of you.”
He was saying so on.
One can’t say on that manner, when i go against the exploitations of
that one. This is the humiliation of my value system and dignity.
43. Withdrawing me from hostel and ordering to withdraw me from the
main gate of school.On 14 Sept 2011,when i went to hostel after the
trapping-conspiracy of principal,principal ordered a teacher to
withdraw me from the hostel and main gate of school.Before this,when i
reached to the main gate of school,gatekeeper stopped me to go under
campus and informed principal about my coming but i reached
hostel.Immediately principal called me principal’s chamber so that i
could not say against him.I would say against principal so he
suppressed in this way.This is the acquisition of my right to protest.
This is the humiliation of my value system and dignity.
44. Only trapping me .I had informed principal about such other
conditions of sleeping. In spite of this,he only trapped me.So,this
trapping is the suppression.This suppression is the mass humiliation
of my value system and dignity because I was understood wrong but a
person behaving same condition was understood not wrong. This is the
acquisition of my right to equality. Because i had informed
principal:-
‘’The one who was catalyst for complaining had slept. Among whom,who
complaint,had slept.Among whom,who supported,had slept.’’
45.Trapping me with Sanjeev.I honour Sanjeev more than myself.But he
trapped me wrongly with him.For his selfishness,principal utilized
Sanjeev against me.This is the largest humiliation of value system and
dignity because a person is utilized wrongly against a another person
due to the unsociality of a dominant power.In my condition,i honour
that person more than myself.Principal was saying that how much you
will apply mind,will trap yourself.So principal trapped me because i
applied my mind for going against my personal tyranny created by
principal. So he must be prosecuted for humiliating my value system
and dignity because value system and dignity lies in the personal life
also.This is the acquisition of my right to self-decision because
without proving against me, I was trapped due to personal and social
prejudices of principal.
46.Justifying wrongly on 14 Sept 2011.I have said to justify on 23 Aug
2011 but he didn’t and created bond for my living.Yes,he justified
wrongly on 14 Sept 2011 after complaining against him.This is the
double humiliation of my value system and dignity.This is the
acquisition of my right to equality.Because I couldn’t be understood
as equal for the justification on 23 August 2011 due to personal and
social prejudices of principal because he had already understood me
wrong so I couldn’t be understood as equal. I have similar opportunity
to prove myself right.This is the acquisition of my right to equality
of similar opportunity.
47.Capturing my independent existence.On 24 Aug 2011,when i flew away
and remained unknown.My father said:-
“He would not ignore anyone including principal if something wrong
would happen to me.”
This thing also played a vital role for principal against my
withdrawal. I have also an independent existence. I can’t be utilized
as a medium between my father and principal. This is the humiliation
of my value system and dignity. This is the acquisition of my right to
freedom.
There are now 27 cases of special conditions where some other is
offender but principal is on the origin of creation of these offences.
As i have said on that written complaining against principal:-
Hon’ble principal has become so dominant to earn his money in such way
that he has created a parallel government irrespective of believing in
the decorum of an institution. Consequently, there is no coordination
between principal and teachers and teachers have created another
parallel government because of the dissatisfaction created among
teachers. Due to these two parallel governments, parallel governments
among the students can be observed also, because there is no
controlling to such students. These three parallel governments are
interrelated to each-other like as the primary, secondary and tertiary
sector of economics. I was a person of strong opinion and living
philosophically like as forth and fifth sector of economics where
there is no probability to create parallel government. There must be
priority to such persons like as the priority of forth and fifth
sector of economics. But, that was the bad politics for gaining
prestige and status.
So below offences are the consequence of the mismanagement and
unbalance of a system. So these offences must be observed in a new
manner.
That’s why principal is on the origin of on the creation of these
below offences:-
In view of this, principal must be prosecuted for the offences of below others:-
1.Aditya Manher(Leader in chief of that extreme organisation of
torturing) and that organisation
2.Amrish Kumar (TGT Science,Associate house master of Sanjeev Suman)
3.Awadesh Kumar (PGT Geography)
4.Pankaj Kumar (Mess Incharge)
5.Balendu Prasad Singh (TGT Mathematics ,House master of Sanjeev Suman)
6.Nisha Kumari ( PGT Hindi )
Regarding Aditya Manher
It was 19 April 2010.I complaint to principal against Aditya
Manher.Because he was showing seniority to his juniors and fricking
me. Consequently when Sanjeev came on 17 Aug 2010 and became my friend
after few days,he started to torture me,torture him,motivated others
to torture me,torture him.They tortured by fricking,abusing,stopping
for hours and questioning,sometimes physically.Even they had some
wrong way of torturing to Sanjeev. On 7 March 2011,when i wanted to
complain against his organisation,he and his group members created
conspiracy and complaint against me to Amrish Kumar,his associate
house master,then to principal and lastly to his mother. Aditya Manher
complaint but the one who gave him mind for complaining had himself
slept.Among his group members,had slept also.In fact,his group members
had also individual problems from me.But he was leader.Among his
supporters,had slept also.His misleadership had created many
depressions and phobias for me,for Sanjeev.
What Aditya Manher and His organisation (In his organisation, there
were three others of his class,who can mislead & misguide their
juniors) did, must be observed first:-
48.Misleaded and misguided junior boys of his house for torturing
me,torturing Sanjeev due to me.Sanjeev was being tortured due to me. I
had to feel the sense of helplessness due to his torturing because he
was being tortured due to me. Due to this sense of helplessness, I was
being tortured mentally and emotionally. It was my double torturing.
49.He himself tortured me,tortured Sanjeev due to me.Sanjeev was being
tortured due to me. I had to feel the sense of helplessness due to his
torturing because he was being tortured due to me. Due to this sense
of helplessness, I was being tortured mentally and emotionally. It was
my double torturing.
50.Trapped me by creating conspiracy for their protection against
wrong works. “Their” always refers to that organisation where that
means he was only leader of that and there were his groups.
51.Protected such other conditions of sleeping but those sleepings
also belonged to their house Arawali B.
52.Participated in misleading ,misguiding and utilizing of Sanjeev’s
mother for their conspiracy.”Their” always refers to that organisation
where that means he was only leader of that and there were his groups.
So there was only his participation.
53.Participated in capturing my right to life.Basically principal has
captured my right to life.
54.Participated in creating depressions and phobiatic natures for
me,for Sanjeev due to me.These depressions and phobiatic natures in
Sanjeev became the cause of creation of problems for Sanjeev against
me.
If there will be the matter of torturing, major members of his groups
tortured more than him.But he was leader in chief, but he was house
captain also.
Why principal must be prosecuted for this? Why the leader and that
organisation must not be prosecuted for this?
Principal must be prosecuted for:-
Above case no-48.Because,Under vidyalaya grievance redressal
cell,(VGRC),i filed an application to principal to constitute a
disciplinary committe to control over the behaviour of juniors but
principal didn’t.So they could torture freely and i had to be helpless
because it was committee who can verdict properly.Going to principal
couldn’t give me verdict,as i wanted to complain against those but
they complaint first against sleeping and principal utilized those
boys as a medium in later time.If there would be disciplinary
committee,i had not to sleep with Sanjeev for 3 days because there
would be no torturing.Consequently,there would be no creation of
depression and fasting of heart-beat due to this,as i slept due to my
depression and fasting of heart-beat. This was not only the
carelessness of principal but principal couldn’t create disciplinary
committee because it was against the sovereignty of principal. On the
other hand, primarily principal created parallel governments.Due to
this,parallel governments among the teachers created.So some students
who can have problems can be unbalanced due to these two parallel
governments and can torture.But who is on the origin?Principal is on
the origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
Above case no-49.Because he could torture because he knew that due to
carelessness of principal and his concentration to earning
money,nothing against him can be done. On the other hand, primarily
principal created parallel governments.Due to this,parallel
governments among the teachers created.So some students who can have
problems can be unbalanced due to these two parallel governments and
can torture.But who is on the origin?Principal is on the origin.So
principal must be prosecuted for this.
Above case no-50.Because the members of that organisation knew that
principal could do anything against those only,who could go against
principal.I was going so it was easy to trap me because principal
would believe in their conspiracy. On the other hand, primarily
principal created parallel governments.Due to this,parallel
governments among the teachers created.So some students who can have
problems can be unbalanced due to these two parallel governments and
can create conspiracy.But who is on the origin?Principal is on the
origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
Above case no-51.Because the members of that organisation knew that
principal could do anything against that only,who could go against
principal.I was going so it was easy to trap me because principal
would believe in their conspiracy.So it was easy for them to protect
such other conditions of sleeping which was not circumstantial. On the
other hand, primarily principal created parallel governments.Due to
this,parallel governments among the teachers created.So some students
who can have problems can be unbalanced due to these two parallel
governments and can be involved in wrong grouping to trap their
opponents and protect their friends.But who is on the origin?Principal
is on the origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
Above case no-52.Because principal had verdicted on 8 March 2011.But
they informed his mother also.This can be possible only when there
will be no controlling to those boys because if there would be
controlling of principal to those boys,they couldn’t have the power to
create further conspiracy,to inform Sanjeev’s mother after informing
to principal.It can be possible only when there will be no trust to
justice due to dissatisfaction,due to negative dissatisfaction created
by the carelessness and concentration to earning money of
principal.But those boys informed his mother only Sanjeev’s sleeping
in my room for 2-3 days.Sanjeev slept with me.The reason behind this
thing was torturing of those boys.Lastly,Sanjeev slept with me on 23
Feb 2011 but they informed on 8 March 2011,after complaining against
the torturing of those boys to principal.Only Sanjeev’s sleeping of
2-3 days were informed by those boys to principal.Same thing was
informed to his mother.Those boys didn’t inform that i used to sleep
regularly with Sanjeev because i didn’t use.It was mind-composed idea
of principal and principal trapped me according to this mind-composed
idea of him.So it can be concluded for case no-52 that due to
irregularities of principal,it was easy to create conspiracy by those
boys of that organisation of Arawali B house because principal himself
created conspiracy by composing his own idea of my regular sleeping
with Sanjeev.Principal must know that Sanjeev would have not to sleep
if he would constitute disciplinary committe because it was due to
torturing.So principal must be prosecuted because his carelessness and
irregularities created such helplessness of sleeping but it was
nothing considered and on the other hand conspiracy was created.A
conspiracy where i was trapped and expelled only due to doubt.There
was no any eye -witness.
Above case no-53.Because It was principal who didn’t listen anything
against those but utilized those as a medium. On the other hand,
primarily principal created parallel governments.Due to this,parallel
governments among the teachers created.So some students who can have
problems can be unbalanced due to these two parallel governments and
can torture and create conspiracy.But who is on the origin?Principal
is on the origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
Above case no-54.Because principal was on the origin of creation of
three parallel governments that means parallel government of those
boys could be created due to dominancy of principal.So such
depressions and phobatic nature created. On the other hand, primarily
principal created parallel governments.Due to this,parallel
governments among the teachers created.So some students who can have
problems can be unbalanced due to these two parallel governments and
can torture and create conspiracy.But who is on the origin?Principal
is on the origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
Regarding Amrish Kumar
I had complaint against him to principal because he used to slap
juniours in class,because those students didn’t prepare their task or
answer the questions .Consequently,he started to torture Sanjeev due
to me.He himself used to say that Sanjeev lived with me.So this is the
prove.He used to slap Sanjeev because he was living with me.On 7 March
2011, when those boys complaint to him,without taking time,he
communicated to principal through telephone,called Sanjeev’s mother
next day by saying to Sanjeet Kashyap.(brother of Sanjeev)He must know
that other boys of his house had slept also.
What he did wrong,must be observed first:-
55. Created sense of helplessness for me by torturing Sanjeev due to
me.Sanjeev was being tortured due to me. I had to feel the sense of
helplessness due to his torturing because he was being tortured due to
me. Due to this sense of helplessness, I was being tortured mentally
and emotionally. It was my double torturing.
56.Created conspiracy for trapping me due to his personal problems.
57.Participated in utilizing,misleading and misguiding his mother by
calling his mother for his conspiracy.
58.Showed sense of carelessness to such other conditions of sleeping.
59.Participated in capturing my right to life.Basically principal has
captured my right to life.
60.Participated in creating depressions and phobiatic natures for
me,for Sanjeev due to me.These depressions and phobiatic natures in
Sanjeev became the cause of creation of problems for Sanjeev against
me.
61. Presented non-developmental behaviour as a teacher.This behaviour
is the behaviour of familism,nepotism and casteism.Because there is no
society and family relationship between myself and Sanjeev.That’s why
prejudices were working and these feelings opened the door for him to
trap me due to his personal problems or wrong motives.But such
conservative must know that i have become the victim of sexual abusing
when i was of 5 years old.That one was non other than my one closed
relative.
Why principal must be prosecuted for this?Why he must not be prosecuted?
Principal must be prosecuted for:-
Above case no-55.Because Amrish Kumar knew that nothing against him
can be done.It is possible only when there will be no proper
controlling of principal to teachers. So principal is responsible. On
the other hand, primarily principal created parallel governments.Due
to this,parallel governments among the teachers created.So teachers
can be unbalanced,as he became,and can torture. But who is on the
origin?Principal is on the origin.So principal must be prosecuted for
this.
Above case no -56.Because Amrish kumar knew that there will be only
believing to his conspiracy.A person like principal couldn’t consider
anything besides his selfishness. So it was easy to create conspiracy.
On the other hand, primarily principal created parallel
governments.Due to this,parallel governments among the teachers
created.So teachers can be unbalanced,as he became,and can create
conspiracy. But who is on the origin?Principal is on the origin.So
principal must be prosecuted for this.
Above case no-57.Because this can be possible only when there will be
no controlling of principal to teachers because if there would be
controlling of principal to teachers,Amrish Kumar couldn’t have the
power to create further conspiracy,to inform Sanjeev’s mother after
informing to principal.It can be possible only when there will be no
trust to justice due to dissatisfaction,due to negative
dissatisfaction created by the carelessness and concentration to
earning money of principal. . On the other hand, primarily principal
created parallel governments.Due to this,parallel governments among
the teachers created.So teachers can be unbalanced,as he became,and
can create conspiracy. But who is on the origin?Principal is on the
origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
Above case no-58.If principal would be justice-lover,Amrish Kumar
couldn’t have the power to only inform principal about my sleeping
.Because Amrish Kumar knew that principal could do any thing against
that only,who could go against principal.I was going so it was easy to
trap me because principal would believe only his conspiracy.So it was
easy for Amrish Kumar to show the sense of carelessness to other
conditions of sleeping. . On the other hand, primarily principal
created parallel governments.Due to this,parallel governments among
the teachers created.So teachers can be unbalanced,as he became,and
can trap someone according to his selfishness. But who is on the
origin?Principal is on the origin.So principal must be prosecuted for
this.
Above case no-59.Because It was principal who didn’t listen anything
against any but could listen if principal would be not the victim of
his personal prejudices.If principal would listen,there would be not
capturing of my right to life. On the other hand, primarily principal
created parallel governments.Due to this,parallel governments among
the teachers created.So teachers can be unbalanced,as he became,and
can create conspiracy. But who is on the origin?Principal is on the
origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
Above case no-60.Because principal was on the origin of creation of
three parallel governments that means parallel government of teachers
could be created due to dominancy of principal.So such depressions and
phobatic nature created. . On the other hand, primarily principal
created parallel governments.Due to this,parallel governments among
the teachers created.So teachers can be unbalanced,as he became,and
can create conspiracy. But who is on the origin?Principal is on the
origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
Above case no-61.Because this non-developmental behaviour could be
suppressed if principal wanted.Action had to taken by principal. So by
taking positive action,this behaviour could be suppressed. . On the
other hand, primarily principal created parallel governments.Due to
this,parallel governments among the teachers created.So teachers can
be unbalanced,as he became,and can present non-developmental
behaviour. But who is on the origin?Principal is on the origin.So
principal must be prosecuted for this.
Regarding Awadesh Kumar
On 7 March 2011,when Amrish Kumar communicated to principal,principal
ordered Awadesh Kumar to look into my matter.He called me and within a
minute started to torture me by snapping my collar and pushing me for
two times.Awadesh Kumar snapped my collar and pushed me because he was
talking in rude manner so i said him that this can’t be tackled by
you.This will be tackled by principal.He started to say that why i
used to refer principal always and so he did so.In fact,he had become
dissatisfied by principal becuase principal didn’t listen anyone.But i
had to face the problems.If Awadesh Kumar tortured me,principal was on
the origin of the creation of this torturing-dissatisfaction created
due to principal was on the origin of this torturing.
In view of this, principal must be prosecuted for:-
62.Motivating a teacher to torture me physically.
63.Participating in creating depressions and phobiatic natures for
me,for Sanjeev due to me.These depressions and phobiatic natures in
Sanjeev became the cause of creation of problems for Sanjeev against
me.These sorts of torturing created depressions and phobiatic nature
and principal was on the origin of creation of torturing. . On the
other hand, primarily principal created parallel governments.Due to
this,parallel governments among the teachers created.So teachers can
be unbalanced,as he became,and can torture. But who is on the
origin?Principal is on the origin.So principal must be prosecuted for
this.
This day,Awadesh Kumar was saying:-
“You have become lunatic,i am going to treat you.”
“If your sister will live in girls hostel,will you go to meet him
under girls hostel?”
“Have you to be Hosni Mobarak Or Saddam Hussain?”
He was saying so on.
But for this mentally and emotionally torturing,he must not be
prosecuted.Principal must be prosecuted because he knew that principal
couldn’t do against him.Principal could do anything against him only
when he did anything against principal. . On the other hand, primarily
principal created parallel governments.Due to this,parallel
governments among the teachers created.So teachers can be
unbalanced,as he became,and can say in such rough way. But who is on
the origin?Principal is on the origin.So principal must be prosecuted
for this.
In view of this, principal must be prosecuted for:-
64.Opening the door for my mentally and emotionally torturing.
65. Motivating a teacher to present non-developmental behaviour as a
teacher.This behaviour is the behaviour of familism,nepotism and
casteism.Because there is no society and family relationship between
myself and Sanjeev.That’s why prejudices were working and these
feelings opened the door for him to torture me due to his personal
problems or wrong motives.But such conservative must know that i have
become the victim of sexual abusing when i was of 5 years old.That one
was non other than my one closed relative.Because this
non-developmental behaviour could be suppressed if principal
wanted.Action had to taken by principal. So by taking positive
action,this behaviour could be suppressed. . On the other hand,
primarily principal created parallel governments.Due to this,parallel
governments among the teachers created.So teachers can be
unbalanced,as he became,and can present non-developmental behaviour.
But who is on the origin?Principal is on the origin.So principal must
be prosecuted for this.
On 14 Sept 2011,when my father said principal to observe the statement
of Sanjeev that Sanjeev was saying that he used to see me at morning
time.Principal replied to my father that he had no need to advocacy
for me.But Awadesh Kumar srarted to support principal by saying that
Sanjeev used to see me at morning.He wanted to say that this is
suffient for proving me wrong.What is this?He was cooperating
principal in one manner also.He remained present before my reaching to
principal’s chamber when principal was creating pressure to his very
few witnesses.This is cleared that he was present when i was being
trapped.His presence created pressure for witnesses.
But for this cooperating in the conspiracy of principal,why he must
not be prosecuted.Why principal must be prosecuted?Principal must be
prosecuted because it was principal’s dominancy due to this,a teacher
had to cooperate principal for creating impression to
principal,whether that teacher could be dissatisfied from principal. .
On the other hand, primarily principal created parallel
governments.Due to this,parallel governments among the teachers
created.So teachers can be unbalanced,as he became,and can create his
personal problems,as he had. But who is on the origin?Principal is on
the origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
In view of this,principal must be prosecuted for:-
66.Motivating a teacher to cooperate in the conspiracy of principal.
Regarding Pankaj Kumar
On 7 March 2011,when Awadesh kumar was torturing me in the presence of
6-7 other teachers,Pankaj Kumar came and started to say against my
going for mess for the checking of water level in milk and curd.
He was torturing me by saying :-
“Are you school captain?”
“Who has given you the right to check?”
He was saying so on.
Immediately he communicated to principal through telephone and started
to say principal to give me the responsibility of school.
But why principal must be prosecuted for this?Why he must not be prosecuted?
Principal must be prosecuted because he knew that principal will not
say anything against him.So whatever he wants to say,can say. He knew
that principal will cooperate him.He knew that principal will
participate with him. But who is on the origin?Principal is on the
origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this. . On the other hand,
primarily principal created parallel governments.Due to this,parallel
governments among the teachers created.So teachers can be
unbalanced,as he became,and can say in such rough way. But who is on
the origin?Principal is on the origin.So principal must be prosecuted
for this.
In view of this,principal must be prosecuted for:-
67.Motivating an official to torture me mentally and emotionally.
On 10 Jan 2011,Sanjeev was sick so he went to mess with me to take
milk and bread.Within a second due to personal problems from me,he
started to talk Sanjeev in very abusing form for about 15 minutes
because he didn’t wear muffler.
But why principal must be prosecuted for this?Why he must not be
prosecuted?Principal must be prosecuted because he knew that principal
will not say anything against him.So whatever he wants to say,can say.
. On the other hand, primarily principal created parallel
governments.Due to this,parallel governments among the teachers
created.So teachers can be unbalanced,as he became,and can say in such
rough way. But who is on the origin?Principal is on the origin.So
principal must be prosecuted for this.
In view of this,principal must be prosecuted for:-
68.Motivating an official to create sense of helplessness for me by
torturing Sanjeev mentally and emotionally due to me.Sanjeev was being
tortured due to me. I had to feel the sense of helplessness due to his
torturing because he was being tortured due to me. Due to this sense
of helplessness, I was being tortured mentally and emotionally. It was
my double torturing.
On 14 Sept 2011,when my father said principal to observe the statement
of Sanjeev that Sanjeev was saying that he used to see me at morning
time.Principal replied to my father that he has no need to advocacy
for me.But along with Awadesh Kumar,Pankaj Kumar srarted to support
principal by saying that Sanjeev used to see me at morning.He wanted
to say that this is suffient for proving me wrong.What is this?
But for this cooperating in the conspiracy of principal,why he must
not be prosecuted.Why principal must be prosecuted?Principal must be
prosecuted because it was principal’s dominancy due to this,a teacher
had to cooperate principal to impress him. This is cleared that he was
present when i was being trapped.His presence created pressure for
witnesses.So, in this way also,he cooperated principal.
. On the other hand, primarily principal created parallel
governments.Due to this,parallel governments among the teachers
created.So teachers can be unbalanced,as he became,and can create his
personal problems,as he had. But who is on the origin?Principal is on
the origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
In view of this,principal must be prosecuted for:-
69.Motivating an official to cooperate in the conspiracy of principal.
70.Motivating an official to present non-developmental behaviour as a
teacher.This behaviour is the behaviour of familism,nepotism and
casteism.Because there is no society and family relationship between
myself and Sanjeev.That’s why prejudices were working and these
feelings opened the door for him to torture me due to his personal
problems or wrong motives.But such conservative must know that i have
become the victim of sexual abusing when i was of 5 years old.That one
was non other than my one closed relative.
Because this non-developmental behaviour could be suppressed if
principal wanted.Action had to taken by principal. So by taking
positive action,this behaviour could be suppressed. . On the other
hand, primarily principal created parallel governments.Due to
this,parallel governments among the teachers created.So teachers can
be unbalanced,as he became,and can present non-developmental
behaviour. But who is on the origin?Principal is on the origin.So
principal must be prosecuted for this.Here,he is being considered as a
teacher by for saying in the pretext of parallel governments because
he is a member of that parallel government.
Regarding Balendu Prasad Singh
On 2 Jan 2011,for third times he said to Sanjeev about his living with
me.He could also say me. But he didn’t.So i had to meet with him on 2
Jan 2011.But he complaint to principal.He himself had meet with me on
3 Oct 2010 due to very small reason and questioned me.This was
sensitive reason.So i met with him. I hadn’t meet him due to the
reason,which was presented by him. On 14 Sept 2011,when principal
called him to object me, he said to principal that he prohibited
students of his house to go outside from the room after 9:30 P:M.He
prohibited his students to not enter others students inside room after
9:30 P:M.So i went to meet him.When i said him that he had said
Sanjeev for 3 times,he replied that he had said among the students of
his house. He told principal that i prohibited him to not say anything
among students because his saying anything convinced wrong message
among the students of his house.He was himself saying so.I was
focusing to the negative impact which can affect Sanjeev due to his
repeated saying to Sanjeev.By saying that wrong message is
convinced,he wanted to prove me wrong because i myself was saying
wrong message is convinced.(in his view)So this was the conspiracy of
him. So he was stating in suspicious way for trapping me.
But for this cooperating in the conspiracy of principal,why he must
not be prosecuted.Why principal must be prosecuted?Principal must be
prosecuted because it was principal’s dominancy due to this,a teacher
had to cooperate principal for creating impression to
principal,whether that teacher could be dissatisfied from principal. .
On the other hand, primarily principal created parallel
governments.Due to this,parallel governments among the teachers
created.So teachers can be unbalanced,as he became,and can create his
personal problems,as he had. But who is on the origin?Principal is on
the origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
In view of this,principal must be prosecuted for:-
71.Motivating a teacher to cooperate in the conspiracy of principal.
72. Motivating a teacher to present non-developmental behaviour as a
teacher.This behaviour is the behaviour of familism,nepotism and
casteism.Because there is no society and family relationship between
myself and Sanjeev.That’s why prejudices were working and these
feelings opened the door for him to torture me due to his personal
problems or wrong motives.But such conservative must know that i have
become the victim of sexual abusing when i was of 5 years old.That one
was non other than my one closed relative.
Because this non-developmental behaviour could be suppressed if
principal wanted.Action had to taken by principal. So by taking
positive action,this behaviour could be suppressed. On the other hand,
primarily principal created parallel governments.Due to this,parallel
governments among the teachers created.So teachers can be
unbalanced,as he became,and can present non-developmental behaviour.
But who is on the origin?Principal is on the origin.So principal must
be prosecuted for this.Here,he is being considered as a teacher by for
saying in the pretext of parallel governments because he is a member
of that parallel government.
In one hand,he was saying so.On the other hand he was unknown from
such other friendship between a junior and a senior. But he must not
be prosecuted for showing carelessness to such other friendship.
Principal must be prosecuted because he knew that principal could see
only the thing related to his problems and i was related to his
problems. So principal couldn’t see carelessness of a teacher. On the
other hand, primarily principal created parallel governments.Due to
this,parallel governments among the teachers created.So teachers can
be unbalanced,as he became,and can work for his selfishness and in
this way can show carelessness.. But who is on the origin?Principal is
on the origin.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
In view of this,principal must be prosecuted for:-
73.Motivating a teacher to show carelessness to such other friendship.
He said Sanjeev for 3 times but didn’t say me even at once.So this
thing was working as my mentally and emotionally torturing.But it was
possible due to the parallel governments where principal was on the
origin.
In this view of matter,principal must be prosecuted for:-
74.Motivating a teacher to develop a way for my mentally and
emotionally torturing.
I had to feel sense of helplessness because Sanjeev was being tortured
mentally and emotionally due to me because he had to face questioning
repeatedly. But it was possible due to the parallel governments where
principal was on the origin.
In this view of matter,principal must be prosecuted for:-
75.Motivating a teacher to create sense of helplessness for me which
was consequently working as my mentally and emotionally torturing.
Regarding Nisha Kumari
On 14 Sept 2011,when i was speaking loudly,Nisha Kumari started to say
principal that i was talking on that way one day also when principal
was not present.When Vishal Kumar came to say against sleeping,i
wanted to cross-question him but along with principal,she didn’t give
me opportunity to be cross-examined by saying that i am trying to keep
Vishal in my favour. On the other hand, primarily principal created
parallel governments.Due to this,parallel governments among the
teachers created.So teachers can be unbalanced,as she became,and can
go to be connected in principal’s conspiracy. But who is on the
origin?Principal is on the origin.So principal must be prosecuted for
this.
But she must not be prosecuted.Principal must be prosecuted because it
was the dominancy of principal due to this,she wanted to impress
principal.
In view of this,principal must be prosecuted for:-
76.Motivating a teacher to cooperate in his conspiracy.
An email which focuses to these all round happenings in brief and
mailed to Sanjeev’s mother is attached.
Now there are some cases of different type:-
Regarding Pintu Kumari ( Sanjeev’s mother)
This is offence of principal not of his mother because she became helplessed.
Why Sanjeev’s mother complaint only due to doubt?The reason on this
origin was principal’s irregularities. Misguidance,misleadership and
misutilization of those boys,social prejudices ,etc ,etc are secondary
factor.On 17 Aug 2011,when Sanjeev came,principal didn’t keep Sanjeev
in Udaygiri B Hostel where Sanjeet Kashyap{Elder of Sanjeev was
living}.He was kept in Arawali B.A mother will want to see both of her
child at one place.But principal wants to see money so he could shift
Sanjeev on Udaygiri B only when money would be given or there would be
impression.But Sanjeev’s mother had no such condition.But she wanted
to change Sanjeev’s house from Arawali B To Udaygiri B.But principal
wouldn’t change.That’s why see needed an excuse so that Sanjeev’s
house could be changed.Referring to me was an excuse for house
changing.In this way his Sanjeev’s house changed on 6 July 2011. I
have totally many evidences in favour of this. So principal created
sense of helplessness for a mother to go through wrong step.On the
other hand, principal wouldn’t change his house but principal wanted
suffocated situation for me so that I can be bound to take TC. That’s
why,principal changed.
If it is assumed that his mother complaint in very wrong manner.In
this regard,this must be noted that if principal would withdraw me
according to the written complain of his mother,objection must be
proved.If i would be withdrawn without proving,as i was withdrawn,this
would be termed as principal’s conspiracy.So there is nothing
relationship of his mother’s written complain to my withdrawl.That
complain was only for house changing and it was changed on 6 July
2011.But i was withdrawn on 14 Sept 2011.
In view of this,principal must be prosecuted for:-
77.Creating sense of helplessness for a mother to go through wrong step.
78.Creating suffocated situation for me by presenting his mother as a medium.
As I have said that his mother wanted to withdraw Sanjeev so I didn’t
say anything on 6 July 2011.That’s why it was my privilege to say by
messaging and email because I have right to protection.I said his
mother about Sanjeev’s psychology,all round torturing,all round
conspiracy etc,etc.But she didn’t inform principal about this.She
informed principal that I have said that the view of principal is
wrong to me.The teachers and students are misguiding his mother.I had
said her about this also but she only informed about this.This thing
created irritation for principal and this thing also played a vital
role for principal for imposing those two conditions of slavery.But
principal is responsible for this because it was principal’s
unsociality due to that,his mother wanted to impress principal and on
the other hand,his mother had been misleaded,misutilized and misguided
by those boys.As I have described that principal is on the origin of
these activities.So principal must be prosecuted for this.
In this view of matter,principal must be prosecuted for:-
79.Creating sense of helplessness for a mother to impress principal as
well as creating sense for accepting the conspiracy of those boys.
80.Behaving with me as a slave,as principal imposed those two
conditions of slavery due to the participation of this thing also.
After my coming from Delhi, his mother informed principal that I have
messaged and mailed her a lot.So principal utilized this thing also as
an excuse for my expulsion. But I messaged and mailed to call her for
justification by informing her all round situations.But she didn’t.But
it was principal’s unsociality due to that,his mother had to inform
principal so that principal could not pressurise and torture her and
her children in further time.So principal is responsible.This thing is
the evidence of this thing that principal has trapped me on that
objection according to his basis because principal utilized those SMS
and email on behalf of his mother.Even she was afraid and had
sympathetic when I flew away from School on 24 August 2011.She started
to clarify her errors.

In this view of matter, principal must be prosecuted for:-
81.Creating sense of helplessness for a mother to cooperate in his unsociality.
That system had reached Sanjeev in such condition where he could not
say anything against that system,so Sanjeev didn’t say after saying at
once on 8 March 2011.His mother had been misguided in such manner
where she could not say against that torturing and Sanjeev’s sleeping
with others.She wanted Sanjeev’s house changing so ,due to this
also,she didn’t concentrate to that torturing and sleeping but
principal bound her for this.In this way,his mother protected that
organisational torturing and his sleeping with others.But who is on
the origin of these all happenings?Principal is on the origin.
In this view of matter,principal must be prosecuted for:-
82.Creating sense of helplessness for a mother to protect that
organisational torturing and sleeping.
Due to her settled mind created by misleadership of those boys as well
as her only concentration to house changing,she didn’t come for
justification after calling.As i have described that principal is on
the origin of these things.One major reason behind this thing is
Sanjeev’s depression.She would think that he was depressed due to
me.But he was depressed due to that system.So principal is on the
origin of this depression.
In this view of matter,principal must be prosecuted for:-
83.Motivating a mother to work prejudicially for creating suffocated
situation for my mentally and emotionally torturing.

On 8 March 2011,Sanjeev had informed his mother about torturing with
Akshay Kumar.[his coaching mate and neighbour] On 11 March 2011,when i
was informing his mother about torturing,Sanjeev and his roommates who
tortured were also present.But after my absconding to Delhi,she wanted
to protect herself and standing right. So she said to principal that
Sanjeev never informed her about it.It was the principal who didn’t
want to listen against his system-his system of oppression because he
was head,how he could listen.So by saying so,his mother tried to
cooperate in his system-where there was only irregularities.But
principal is on the origin of this because his mother was misleaded by
that system,helplessed by that system etc,etc ,as i have described
earlier.

In this view of matter,principal must be prosecuted for:-

84.Motivating a mother to cooperate in his system of irregularities.

Regarding Praveen Kumar(PGT ,History)
He withdrew me from the hostel on 14 Sept 2011 by the order of
principal.It was his helplessness to impress principal,so he
withdrew.He is associate house master of Arawali A,the house where I
was living.So he refused to hold my responsibility to impress
principal.So principal is responsible.Due to the impressive tendency
to principal,he statrted to say:-

”There is no place of you in this school.”

”Never come in this school again.”

”Blank the hostel.”

He said due to impressive tendency to principal,so principal is responsible.
In this view of matter,principal must be prosecuted for:-
85.Creating sense of helplessness for a teacher to cooperate in his conspiracy.

| NEXT



Tags:

Rate this Article:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

0 प्रतिक्रिया

  • SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Post a Comment

CAPTCHA Image
*

Reset

नवीनतम प्रतिक्रियाएंLatest Comments


topic of the week



latest from jagran